IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA,THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR
Metkari Laxman – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 6651/2026
##PAGE1##
1
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HON’BLE JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA
AND
THE HON’BLE JUSTICE GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No.6651 OF 2026
DATE: 05.03.2026
Between:
Metkari Laxman
… Petitioner
And
The State of Telangana
Rep by its Principal Secretary,
Home Department, Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Telangana
Secretariat, Hyderabad and five others
...Respondents
Mr. D.Suresh Kumar, learned counsel representing Mr.M.Dinesh, learned counsel
appearing for the petitioner.
Mr.Swaroop Oorilla, the learned Special Government Pleader representing the learned
Advocate General appearing for the respondent Nos.1 to 5.
ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Justice Moushumi Bhattacharya)
1. This Writ Petition was filed seeking a Writ of Habeas
Corpus for tracing the alleged detenue, and for a direction on
the respondent Nos.2 and 3 viz., the Director General of Police,
Lakdi ka pul, Hyderabad and the Superintendent of Police,
Sanga Reddy District, respectively, to constitute a special Police
Team for tracing the alleged detenue. The petitioner has also
prayed for providing medical treatment to the alleged detenue
##PAGE2##2
for the purpose of termination of her pregnancy, in view of the
health condition of the alleged detenue.
2. The petitioner claims to be the father of the alleged
detenue, who is a minor girl of 16 years. The petitioner further
claims that the alleged detenue is in the illegal detention of the
respondent No.6.
3. After hearing the preliminary submissions made on behalf
of the parties, the Court had directed the learned Special
Government Pleader to produce the alleged detenue before the
Court today.
4. The alleged detenue was accordingly produced before the
Court. Considering the sensitive nature of the disclosures made
on behalf of the alleged detenue, the Court further directed that
the matter be heard in Chambers.
5. We have heard the submissions of the alleged detenue as
well as those of the mother of the alleged detenue.
6. The alleged detenue claimed that she had married the
respondent No.6 in Mumbai on 31.01.2026. The alleged
detenue also submitted that she is currently, five months
pregnant.
##PAGE3##3
7. The alleged detenue further stated that she wanted to live
with the respondent No.6 and did not want to terminate her
pregnancy.
8. The alleged detenue’s mother expressed serious
reservations regarding the character of the respondent No.6 and
the future prospects of the alleged detenue in the event that she
leaves her parental home and continues to reside with the
respondent No.6.
9. After considering the submissions made on behalf of the
petitioner (father of the alleged detenue), the alleged detenue,
and her mother, and upon giving due consideration to the facts
of the case and the interest of the alleged detenue, who is a
minor girl aged 16 years and a student of Class IX at Kavita
High School, Bidar, Karnataka, we are of the considered view
that the alleged detenue should be returned to the custody of
the petitioner and the alleged detenue’s mother i.e., her parents.
The alleged detenue is admittedly a minor and the imminent
possibility of bearing a child would impact on her life and future
prospects.
10. We would have given due weightage to the wish of the
detenue not to terminate her pregnancy if the detenue had been
an adult. However, the more important consideration would
##PAGE4##4
have to be the fact that the detenue is still a minor and a child
born to her at this stage of her life may have irreversible
consequences. We believe that the alleged detenue should
complete her education at this stage of her life rather than
starting life as a married woman.
11. We are alive to the fact of the limited scope of a Writ for
Habeas Corpus. Hence, we do not wish to give any opinion as
to whether the alleged detenue should be forced to terminate
her pregnancy as per the wishes of her parents. The only point
that we deem necessary to state is that any termination of
pregnancy shall be carried out in accordance with The Medical
Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971, as amended by The
Medical
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.