IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR
P. Prabhakar Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 6702/2026
##PAGE1##
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT
HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No.6702 of 2026
DATE OF ORDER: 05.03.2026
Between:
Sri. P Prabhakar Reddy.
…Petitioner
AND
The State of Telangana, Municipal Administration and Urban Development
Department and seven others.
…Respondents
ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for
Municipal Administration and Urban Development appearing for respondent
No.1, Sri.Srinivas Rao Pachwa, learned standing counsel for GHMC appearing
for respondent Nos.2 and 3, learned Government Pleader for Home appearing
for respondent No.4, learned Government Pleader for Excise appearing for
respondent No.5, learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for
respondent No.6 and learned Government Pleader for Forest appearing for
respondent No.7. With their consent, the writ petition is being taken up for
disposal at the admission stage itself.
2. This writ petition has being filed seeking the following prayer:-
“to declare the action of the residents not protecting the park and trees and
allowing the illegal constructions in park area and allowing conducting
functions, supplying liquor and banned drugs during the period of
functions without considering my representation Dt 21.11.2025,
25.02.2026, 27.02.2026, as illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct 1) the
Respondent Nos.2 and 3 to protect the park by demolishing the illegal
constructions, 2)Respondent No.7 may be directed to initiate the criminal
proceedings for cutting of 35 trees worth 30 lakhs in the park area by
ceasing tractor machinery and road 3) Respondent No.5 may be directed to
initiate the criminal proceedings against the persons serving the liquor by
conducting the night parties and day parties in park area 4) Respondent
No.4 may be directed to take action against the illegal parking of vehicles in
the colony and not to allow conducting the parties in the public park in this
##PAGE2##2
Sy No.50, Kranti Golden Gate (Green fields Infra), Yellareddyguda Kapra
Village and Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District.”
3. Brief facts as stated in this writ petition are that the petitioner is the
resident of Plot No.37, Kranti Golden Gate (Green fields Infra), Yellareddyguda,
Kapra Village and Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District. It is submitted that in
the year 2009, the HMDA, with respect to 5.6 Acers of land in Sy.No.50 (P) of
Kapra Village, Keesara Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, sanctioned layout
for about 52 plots and in the said layout there is an open land admeasuring to an
extent of 2673 Sq.yards and the same is marked as park land. To support his
contentions, learned counsel for the petitioner placed on record a copy of
sanctioned layout. The case of the petitioner is that some colony persons illegally
constructed building in park area and are cutting large number of trees,
conducting functions, serving liquor, playing loud music at late nights, parking
huge number of vehicles infront of the residents and the same is causing
nuisance. Hence, the petitioner on 21.11.2025, 16.12.2025, 25.02.2026 and
27.02.2026, made representations and requested the respondent authorities to
take action. However, the same are still pending for consideration. Aggrieved by
the same, this writ petition is filed.
4. Learned standing counsel for GHMC appearing for respondent Nos.2 and
3 submits that if the petitioner’s representations dated 21.11.2025, 16.12.2025,
25.02.2026 and 27.02.2026 are still pending for consideration, the respondent
authorities would consider the same and would pass appropriate orders in
accordance with law.
##PAGE3##3
5. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Forest appearing for
respondent No.7 would submit that for cutting of trees, already Preliminary
Offence Report (POR) bearing No.11/01 dated 27.02.2026 is served on
respondent No.8 and he was directed to pay penalty of Rs.20,000/- and submits
that they would take further course of action in accordance with law.
6. In the case on hand it is relevant to ref
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.