SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 7871

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH,THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.M. MOHIUDDIN
M/s. Sri Venkateswara Constructions – Appellant
Versus
Deputy State Tax Officer – Respondent
WP 6964/2026



##PAGE1##

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD The Hon’ble The Chief Justice Sri Aparesh Kumar Singh and The Hon’ble Sri Justice G.M.Mohiuddin Writ Petition No.6964 of 2026 Dated: 09.03.2026 Between:

Sri Venkateswara Constructions, Rep. by its Managing Partner, Mr. Narra Aravind, # 1-1-2/5, Bandarugudem, Rajivgandhinagar, Manuguru Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem, Telangana – 507117 ...Petitioner and Deputy Tax Officer, O/o. Assistant Commissioner (State Taxes) Kothagudem –I Circle, Warangal Division, Telangana and 2 others.

...Respondents

Order:

Heard Mr. K.P.Amarnath Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. K.Sai Akarsh, learned Assistant Government Pleader for State Tax appearing for the respondents.

2. The Goods and Services Tax (GST) registration certificate of the petitioner bearing No.36ABDFS6483K1ZM was cancelled vide impugned order in Form GST REG-19 dated 28.03.2023 for non-filing of returns for a consecutive period of six months. The petitioner preferred a time-barred been dismissed on the ground of delay. Thereafter, the petitioner has filed the instant Writ Petition for revocation of cancellation of GST registration. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that aftermath Covid-19 pandemic, petitioner suffered heavy losses in the business and could not continue its business and its accountant failed to file NIL returns. It is submitted that non-filing of returns was for the reason that the proprietor of the petitioner has completely relied upon the Accountant for filing of the monthly returns and he was also unaware of the show cause notice and there was no intentional delay. Though the petitioner has sought to file an application for revocation of cancellation of GST registration, the GST portal did not permit the petitioner as being beyond the time limit prescribed for submission. Therefore, the petitioner prays that respondent No.1 may be directed to entertain the petitioner’s application manually and take a decision thereupon in accordance with law.

##PAGE2##

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for State Tax submits that months.

5. Having regard to the aforesaid facts and circumstances and also months, if the petitioner approaches the competent authority within a period of one week from today for submission of application for revocation of cancellation of GST registration, in physical form, the competent authority would entertain it and take a decision thereupon in accordance with law within a period of three weeks thereafter.

##PAGE3##

6. The instant Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

____________________________ APARESH KUMAR SINGH, CJ ___________________ G.M.MOHIUDDIN, J D

L U

a

R

t e: 09.03.2026

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top