HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA ********

WRIT PETITION NOs.27374 & 30563 OF 2014 W.P.No.27374 of 2014:

Between:

M/s.Brilliant Bio Pharma Ltd., Khairatabad, Hyderabad.

…. Petitioner and State of Telangana, rep.by its Prl.Secretary, Municipal Admn. & Urban Development Dept., Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad and two others.

…. Respondents DATE OF JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED : 10.03.2026 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO

1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers : No may be allowed to see the Judgments ?

2. Whether the copies of judgment may be : Yes marked to Law Reporters/Journals

3. Whether Their Lordship wish to : Yes see the fair copy of the Judgment ?

__________________________________

SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO, J *HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO + WRIT PETITION NOs.27374 & 30563 OF 2014 %10.03.2026 Between:

# M/s.Brilliant Bio Pharma Ltd., Khairatabad, Hyderabad.

…. Petitioner Vs.

$ State of Telangana, rep.by its Prl.Secretary, Municipal Admn. & Urban Development Dept., Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad and two others.

…. Respondents !Counsel for the petitioner(s) : Mr. D.Prakash Reddy, learned Senior Counsel representing Mr. J.Srinadh Reddy, for petitioners in both the writ petitions Counsel for the Respondents : Mr. V.Siddhartha Goud,learned counsel representing Mr. V.Narasimha Goud, learned Standing Counsel for HMDA in both the writ petitions.

Gist :

>Head Note:

? Cases referred:

2006 SCC Online AP 909 2010 SCC Online AP 1198 (2018) 6 SCC 410 AIR 1967 SC 1910 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO WRIT PETITION NOs.27374 & 30563 OF 2014 DATE: 10.03.2026 W.P.No.27374 of 2014:

Between:

M/s.Brilliant Bio Pharma Ltd., Khairatabad, Hyderabad.

…. Petitioner and State of Telangana, rep.by its Prl.Secretary, Municipal Admn. & Urban Development Dept., Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad and two others.

…. Respondents

COMMON ORDER:

The above said writ petitions are arising out of the very same property and between the same parties and the reliefs claimed in both the writ petitions are inter-connected with each other and accordingly the said writ petitions heard together analogously and have been decided by this common order and the W.P.No.27374 of 2014 is taken as lead and comprehensive writ petition to answer all the issues which also covers the consequential issue in W.P.No.30563 of 2014.

WP No.27374 of 2014:

2. The instant writ petition has been filed declaring the notice issued by the respondent vide proceedings bearing No.11172/ EMU/HMDA/09, dated 09.09.2014, in respect of petitioner's property, admeasuring Acs.3.12 guntas, situated in Sy.No.775 of Shamsabad village and Mandal, Ranga Reddy district, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently, to set aside the same.

WP No.30563 of 2014

3. The instant writ petition has been filed declaring the inaction on the part of the respondents in rectifying the mistake committed in the Conveyance deed bearing document No.1365/2011, dated 19.05.2011, executed by the respondents in favour of the petitioner, despite the representation being made dated 26.08.2014, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently, direct the respondents to forthwith rectify the mistakes that have crept in the conveyance deed vide document No.1365/2011, dated 19.05.2011.

4. The brief facts of the case in W.P.No.27374 of 2014 are that, the petitioner's company, earlier was known as ‘Brilliant Industries Limited,’ and that Brilliant Industries Ltd., was the absolute owner and possessor of land admeasuring Acs.3.11 guntas, situated in Sy.Nos.31, 32, 34, 35 and 38 of Tondupalli Village, Shamshabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, having purchased the same in the year 1998 vide a registered sale deed from its original pattadar for a valid sale consideration. The petitioner contends though the land along with other adjacent land was proposed to be acq