SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 8343

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY
The CMR Shopping Mall – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana and 2 others – Respondent
WP 153/2021



IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDEABAD HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY WRIT PETITION No.153 of 2021 DATE : 12.03.2026 Between The CMR Shopping Mall …Petitioner AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration & Urban Development Department, Hyderabad and others.

…Respondents :ORDER:

This writ petition is filed to declare the action of the respondent authorities in issuing impugned Challans bearing Notice Nos.124473/Dir/EV&DM/CEC/GHMC, dated 12.08.2020 and 151851/Dir/EV&DM/CEC/GHMC, dated 16.12.2020, purported to be issued under Section 420, 421, 674, 596 and 487 of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 and G.O.Ms.No.68, Municipal Administration & Urban Development (GHMC) Department, dated 20.04.2020, alleging commission of offences viz i)unauthorized erection of banners/cutouts and erection of unauthorized Advertisement element above 15 feet in height from ground level, respectively, and compounded with a fine of Rs.5,000/- and 1,00,000/- respectively, as illegal and arbitrary and for consequential relief.

2. Sri Akul Reddy, learned counsel representing Sri G.Anandam, learned counsel for the petitioner on record and Sri G.Madhusudhan Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.2, are present.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the issue raised in the present writ petition is squarely covered by common order dated 11.01.2023 passed by this Court in WP.Nos.36328 of 2022 and batch, wherein this Court partly allowed the writ petitions as under;

“G.O.Ms.No.68, dated 20.04.2020 insofar as imposing the penalties is set aside as the same is contrary provisions of the Act. Consequently all the demand notices are set aside. The remaining part of the G.O.

holds good.”

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner prayed to dispose of the present writ petition in terms of the aforesaid common order 5. Learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.2 (GHMC) did not dispute the same.

6. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of in terms of common order dated 11.01.2023, passed by this Court in WP.Nos.36328 of 2022 and batch. There shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

___________________________________ LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY, J Date: 12.03.2026 Note: Registry is directed to annex A copy of the order dated 11.01.2023

B/o.tk

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top