SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 8485

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
K.Ravi Kiran – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 15423/2018



IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No.15423 of 2018 DATE OF ORDER: 13.03.2026 Between:

K. Ravi Kiran ...Petitioner AND State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Excise Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad, Telangana and 3 others ...Respondents

ORDER :

This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed seeking the following relief:

“…to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in issuing proceeding Rc.No.369/2017/P&E/A3, dated 20-12-2017 to levy penalty and penal interest as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the provisions of Telangana Excise Act, 1968, read with Telangana Excise (Grant of License of Selling by Bar and Conditions of License)

Rules, 2005, unconstitutional, in violation of principles of natural justice and consequently set aside the same and direct the respondents not to interfere with the petitioner’s business and pass..…”

2. Heard Ms. Katta Sravya, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri Arun Kumar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Prohibition Excise appearing for the respondents and perused the record.

3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the present writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Therefore, no further orders are required to be passed and hence seek to dismiss the same as infructuous.

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Prohibition Excise takes no objection to the same.

5. Recording the said submission, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no orders as to costs.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed.

____________________ E.V.VENUGOPAL, J Dated: 13.03.2026 VSU

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top