SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 8519

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
K. Narsing Rao – Appellant
Versus
The Additional Collector – Respondent


HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4099 OF 2025 Date:13.03.2026 Between K. Narsing Rao ……..Petitioner and The Additional Collector (Revenue)

Medchal – Malkajgiri District at Anthaipally and others. ….…respondents This Court passed the following

ORDER

Heard Sri Basa Chanakya, learned counsel for the petitioner, Ms. Tekuru Swetcha, learned Asst.Govt.Pleader for Revenue, appearing for respondent Nos.1 and 3, Sri E.Madan Mohan Rao, learned Senior counsel representing Sri Chelimella Dheeraj Kumar Simha, learned counsel appearing for 2nd respondent, Sri A.Venkatesh, learned Senior Counsel representing Sri K.S.Naga Narasimha Reddy, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.10 and Sri Suresh Podder, learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos.12 and 13. Despite service of notice, there is no representation on behalf of respondent Nos.4 to 9 and 11.

2. This revision is filed under Section 28 of Telangana Abolition of Inams Act, 1955 (for short, ‘the Act, 1955’), challenging the order dated 16.10.2025 passed in Case No.F1/2528/2024 by 1st respondent.

3. 2nd respondent herein had filed an appeal under Section 24 of the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top