SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 8848

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
B. RAJU – Appellant
Versus
The Government of A.P. – Respondent
WP(TR) 347/2017



##PAGE1##

1 SK, J W.P.(TR).No.347of 2017

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH

WRIT PETITION (TR) No.347 of 2017

Date:25.03.2026 Between:

B. Raju.

…Petitioner.

And The Government of Andhra Pradesh rep. by its Principal Secretary, Irrigation & CAD (PW:R&R) Department,

Secretariat, Hyderabad-500 022 and others.

...Respondents.

ORDER:

In view of elevation of the learned counsel for the

petitioner on record as the Hon’ble Judge at High Court of Andhra Pradesh, this Court has directed the Registry to issue notice to the petitioner on 04.02.2026 and the notice sent to the petitioner was unserved with endorsement ‘door

locked’.

2. In the instant writ petition, the petitioner is questioning the action of the respondent No.1 in passing the impugned order in rejecting his case for promotion to the post of Junior Assistant vide proceedings Memo

##PAGE2##

2 SK, J W.P.(TR).No.347of 2017

No.18227/R&R-A2/2012-2 dated 18.12.2012 on the ground that the petitioner was accepted the appointment as Office Subordinate and joined to duty as Office Subordinate and he will be governed by A.P.Last Grade Service Rules in vogue, according to which he must have to complete 5 years of continuous service in the cadre of Office Subordinate and he will be considered for the post of Junior Assistant as per his seniority, rule of reservation and availability of vacancies for appointment by transfer from Office Subordinate to the post of Junior Assistant, which service is being governed by the A.P. State and

Subordinate Service Rules.

3. The respondent No.1 filed counter reiterating the contentions as stated in the impugned Memo dated 18.12.2012. Moreover, the petitioner has accepted the appointment as Office Subordinate and joined duty on 30.07.2009 and immediately after joining duty after three months, he made a representation to the authorities to consider his case of promotion to the post of Junior Assistant and the respondents have passed the impugned

##PAGE3##

3 SK, J W.P.(TR).No.347of 2017

order rejecting his case for promotion. Once the petitioner has joined duty accepting the appointment as Office Subordinate on 30.07.20209, he has no right to seek promotion immediately to the post of Junior Assistant. In view of the same, there are no grounds in the writ petition

warranting interference by this Court.

4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No order

as to costs. .

5. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending in this writ

petition, shall stand closed.

____________________

JUSTICE K.SARATH Date:25.03.2026

sj

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top