HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA AND THE HON’BLE JUSTICE GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR CMA NOs.121, 122 AND 123 OF 2026 DATE: 31.03.2026 BETWEEN CMA NOs.121, 122 AND 123 OF 2026 Devender Kumar.

…Appellant AND Santosh Kumar Agarwal and Nine Others.

…Respondents Mr. R A Achuthanand, learned counsel appearing for the appellant.

COMMON JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Justice Moushumi Bhattacharya)

1. The present Appeals have been filed challenging the docket orders dated 11.02.2026 passed in C.C.SR.Nos.4873 of 2025, 4878 of 2026 and 4869 of 2025 by the learned Principal Special Court in the Cadre of District Judge for Trial and Disposal of Commercial Disputes, City Civil Court at Hyderabad (‘Commercial Court’) returning the Plaint filed by the appellant herein on the grounds that there was no specific mention of the words ‘trade’ or ‘commerce’ in the pleadings and that the Plaint does not disclose whether the agreement between the parties is a commercial agreement dealing with a commercial transaction. The plaintiff failed to file a copy of the lease agreement, which is necessary to determine the nature and intended use of the immovable property. To