SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 8982

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO
G.Narayana – Appellant
Versus
The Dy. Commissioner – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO WRIT PETITION NOs.33699, 33586, 33687, 33709, 33788, 33790, 33796, & 33817 OF 2015 DATE: 31.03.2026 W.P.No.33699 of 2015:

Between:

G.Narayana, s/o. Anjaiah, R/o. MIG 53, APHB Colony, Balaji Nagar, Kukatpally, Hyderabad.

…. Petitioner and The Deputy Commissioner, Circle-XII, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Serilingampally, Hyderabad and three others.

…. Respondents

COMMON ORDER:

Heard Mr. M.M.Vali, learned counsel for petitioners in all writ petitions, Mr. V.Siddardh Goud, learned counsel representing Mr. V.Narasimha Goud, learned Standing Counsel for HMDA and Mr.

G.Madhu Sudhan Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for GHMC.

2. All these writ petitions are though filed by the different petitioners, however, the subject matter of the property in all the writ petitions is one and the same, and the factual matrix and the principle contentions made by the petitioners are same and their permissions for construction of building were rejected by the respondents Nos.1 to 3, thus, all the writ petitions are heard together and the issue is decided by this common order.

3. The W.P.No.33699 of 2015

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top