THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN AND THE HON’BLE JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO APPEAL SUIT NO.10 OF 2026 Dated: 30.03.2026

1.Cheera Anusha and another … Appellants-Respondent Nos.1 & 2-Plaintiffs Vs.

1.Gorige Pentaiah … Respondent No.1-Petitioner-Defendant No.1

2.Gorige Bakkamma and others … Respondents-Defendants [R2 to R45 are not necessary parties in this appeal]

JUDGMENT

(per the Hon’ble Justice B.R.Madhusudhan Rao)

1. This Memorandum of Appeal is filed under Section 96 of Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) assailing the order passed by the learned I Additional District Judge at Bhuvanagiri in I.A.No.427 of

2023 in O.S.No.124 of 2019, dated 12.09.2025.

2. Appellants are the respondent Nos.1 and 2 – plaintiffs. Respondent No.1 is the petitioner – defendant No.1 in I.A.No.427 of

2023 in O.S.No.124 of 2019.

3. It is mentioned in the cause title of the appeal that respondent Nos.2 to 45 are not necessary parties to the present appeal.

4. Learned counsel for the appellants – respondent Nos.1 and 2 - plaintiffs submits that the learned Trial Court rejected the plaint on the ground that the suit for partition is not maintainable and that the lea