SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 9181

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA
Mr.Shahed Siddiqui – Appellant
Versus
Mr.Amaan Noorudin Dharani – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA ARBITRATION APPLICATION No.98 of 2025 DATE: 18.03.2026 Between:

Mr.Shahed Siddiqui …..Applicant AND Mr.Amaan Noorudin Dharani and 7 others …..Respondents Mr. Vivek Jain, learned counsel appearing for the applicant.

Mr. B. Vamshidhar Reddy, learned counsel representing Mr.K.S. Suneel, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.1.

Mr. A.Naveen Rudra, learned counsel representing Mr. Dharmapuri Kiran, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.2.

ORDER:

1. The present Arbitration Application has been filed under section 11(5) and (6) of The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of a Sole Arbitrator for adjudication of the disputes between the parties.

2. The dispute arises out of a Development Agreement-cum- General Power of Attorney dated 11.11.2022 executed by the respondent No.2 (the land owner) in favour of the respondent No.1 (1st party) and the applicant herein (2nd party) for development of the land.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that the respondent Nos.3 to 8 have been made parties to the present Application since they are trans

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top