IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA C.R.P.NO.157 OF 2026 DATE: 18.03.2026 Between:

Sri T Anitha Kumar Reddy.

...Petitioner AND Rejintala Vikram Kumar And Another.

...Respondents Mr. Sarat Ram Suryadevara, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.

ORDER:

1. This is the second occasion when learned counsel appearing for the petitioner was given an opportunity to make submissions. Hence, the Court deems it fit to proceed with the matter and decide the CRP.

2. The only submission made by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner is that the Trial Court erred in dismissing the petitioner’s application (I.A.No.2014 of 2024 in O.S.No.89 of 2023) for rejection of the Plaint under Order VII Rule 11 (a) and (d) read with section 151 of The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (‘CPC’).

3. The petitioner is the defendant No.2 in a Suit (O.S.No.89 of 2023) filed for specific performance of Agreement of Sale and declaring the Sale Deed as null and void and for perpetual injunction.

4. The petitioner/defendant No.2 filed I.A.No.2014 of 2024 in O.S.No.89 of 2023 for rejection of the Plaint on the ground that the Plaint fails to disclose a