SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 9214

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
Ramya Manikonda – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 37725/2025



IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No.37725 of 2025 Dated: 18.03.2026 Between:

Ramya Manikonda … Petitioner And The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and seven others … Respondents

ORDER:

The present Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for the following relief/s:-

‘‘… to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the Respondent No.3 in not filing the charge sheet against the Respondent no.4 to 8 in Crime No.540 of 2025 dt.28.05.2025 U/Sec.69, 318(4), 351(2) r/w 3(5) of BNS of PS., Bachupally, Cyberabad is illegal, arbitrary and contrary to law and consequently direct the Respondent No.3 to file the charge sheet against the respondent no.4 to 8 in Crime No.540 of 2025 dt.28.05.2025 of PS., Bachupally, Cyberabad and pass such order or orders …”

2. Heard Mr.P.Animi Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.M.Srinivas, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home representing learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 3. Perused the record.

3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, by furnishing the written instructions dated 12.12.2025 addressed by the Sub-Inspector of Police, Bachupally Police Station, Cyberabad Commissionerate submits that the upon registration of F.I.R.No.540 of 2025, respondent No.3 had issued notice to the petitioner under Section 94 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on 10.12.2025 requesting him to furnish relevant documentary evidence. But the petitioner, instead of filing the relevant material papers, approached this Court by filing the present Writ Petition. Therefore, he contends that after recording the statements of complainant and obtaining medical reports, the investigation will be completed and appropriate report would be filed before the learned Magistrate concerned. Stating so, he seeks to dismiss the Writ Petition.

4. Recording the submissions of learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home and taking the written instructions dated 12.12.2025 onto the file, this Writ Petition is disposed of by granting liberty to the petitioner to work out the remedies as available under law. No costs.

Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.

____________________________

JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL

18.03.2026

ESP

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top