IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No.3183 of 2026 Dated: 18.03.2026 Between:

Boya Krishna and three others … Petitioners And The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj & Rural Development Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and six others … Respondents

ORDER:

The present Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for the following relief/s:-

‘‘… to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly, one in the nature of “Writ of Mandamus”

i) Declaring the inaction and failure of Respondent No.2 in considering the representation dated 15.11.2025 to complying with the order dated 14.06.2021 in W.P.No. 8969 of 2021 as arbitrary, illegal, and unconstitutional and contemptuous.

ii)Consequently, directing Respondent No.2 to immediately, comply with the said order by forthwith looking into the matter, conducting a factual and legal enquiry, and passing a speaking order on the petitioners’

representations within a strict timeframe.

iii) Grant such other and further relief/s as this Honorable Court deems fit and proper in the interests of justice and pass such other order or orders …”

2. Heard Mr.Arshad Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr.Ashok Kumar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayath Raj and Rural Development appearing for respondent Nos.1 and 4, Mr.K.Mahesh, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent Nos.2, 3 and 5, Mr.Ramakrishna Reddy, learned counsel representing Mr.K.Pradeep Reddy, learned standing counsel for respondent No.6. Perused the record.

3. When the matter is taken up for consideration, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks a direction to respondent No.2 to consider and pass appropriate orders on the representation dated 15.11.2025 submitted by the petitioners.

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue contends that appropriate orders would be passed on the representation dated 15.11.2025 submitted by the petitioners in due course of time.

5. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayath Raj and Rural Development and learned counsel for respondent No.6 are formal parties to this Writ Petition.

6. In view of the aforesaid submissions, this Court without making any observations on the merits or demerits of the case deems it appropriate to direct respondent No.2 to examine the representation dated 15.11.2025 submitted by the petitioners and pass appropriate orders, as expeditiously as possible, strictly in accordance with law.

7. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.

____________________________

JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL

18.03.2026

ESP

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL

257 W.P.No.3183 of 2026 Dated: 18.03.2026 ESP