SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 9244

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI
B.Venkatesh and 4 others – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 7333/2020



IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD DATE: 18.03.2026 Between:

B.Venkatesh and Others …Petitioners AND State of Telangana and Others …Respondents

ORDER:

This Writ Petition is filed with the following relief:

“…to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.5 herein and other police personals in subjecting the petitioners and villagers to endless torture under the guise of investigation of death of villager namely Krishnaiah as being illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 21 of the Constitution of India. and further declare the action of respondent No.3 herein in not considering the complaint of the petitioners dated-23.05.2020 to register a case against the respondent No.5 herein and other police personals for custodial torture and illegal confinement and further declare the inaction of the respondent Nos. 3 and 4 herein to take disciplinary action for violating the law in respect of custodial interrogation and consequently direct the respondent No.1 and 4 herein to pay monetary compensation of rupees 5 Iakhs each to the victim of custodial torture in the hands of respondent No.5 herein and pass such other order or orders may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case...”

2. Ms.Sakshi Jha, learned counsel representing Mr.V.Raghunath, learned counsel for the petitioners sought permission to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to avail appropriate remedies before the trial Court.

3. Permission, as prayed for, is accorded.

4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty as prayed for. There shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.

__________________

N. TUKARAMJI, J

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top