IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA WRIT PETITION No.6149 of 2026

18.03.2026 Between:

Eragudla Raju Yadav …Petitioner AND The Union of India, Rep., by its Principal Secretary, Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Shastry Bhavan, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Marg, New Delhi and another.

…Respondents

ORDER

The petitioner is aggrieved by the action of respondent-

authorities in showing him as “disqualified director” on their Organizational Web Portal or Website, instead of showing the petitioner as an active director. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner’s disqualification period was until 22.03.2019 and though, the disqualification period ended in 2019 itself, the online portal of the respondent authorities show that the petitioner is still disqualified, whereas the petitioner has active directorship and therefore, entitled to restoration of his DIN.No.00492258

2. Heard Mr. K.R. Srikanth, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. A. Kranti Kumar Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent Nos.1 and 2.

3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, both the learned counsel submit that the subject matter is covered by th