SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 9511

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
E.V. Venugopal, J
M/s. Swetha Filling Station – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WRIT PETITION No.1116 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Y. Ashok Raj
For the Respondents: M. Srinivas, Sahithi Sri Kavya

The court examined the adherence to minimum distance norms (300 meters) for fuel stations on rural undivided National Highways as per MoRTH guidelines, although it ultimately declined to interfere in the petition.

Headnote:The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus to prevent the grant of a No Objection Certificate (NOC) for a new retail outlet. The petition cited non-compliance with the Guidelines for Access, Location and Layout of Roadside Fuel Stations and Service Stations (Third Revision) 2009 and Circular No.RW- NH-33032/01/2017-S&R® dated 26.06.2020. The court found that the distance between the existing fuel station and the proposed one was less than 50 meters, which violates the minimum distance requirement of 300 meters for rural undivided carriage ways. The primary issue was whether the proposed establishment of a petrol pump violated the prescribed location norms for rural stretches of National Highways. The court observed that the distance between the fuel stations did not conform to Section 2.2 of the relevant guidelines. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to work out the remedies in accordance with law.

Table of Content
1. petition challenging the grant of noc for a petrol pump based on location guidelines. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. violation of the minimum 300-meter distance norm for rural fuel stations. (Para 4 , 5)
3. disposal of the writ petition without interference, granting liberty for other legal remedies. (Para 6 , 7)

ORDER:

The present Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for the following relief/s:-

‘‘…to issue a Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS directing the 2 nd respondent not to grant No Objection Certificate (NOC) in favour of the 11 th respondent for establishment of new Jio BP Petrol Pump/Retail Outlet over the land in Sy.No. 779/A/2, Vennampalle Village, Srirampur Mandal, Peddappalli District, Telangana, in pursuance of the Guidelines for Access, Location and Layout of Roadside Fuel Stations and Service Stations (Third Revision) issued by Indian Roads Congress, 2009 as well as Circular No.RW- NH-33032/01/2017-S&R®, dated 26.06.2020 issued by Govt. of India, Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, New Delhi and pass…”

2. Heard Mr.Y.Ashok Raj, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr.M.Srinivas, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, appearing for respondent Nos.1 and 2, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, appearing for respondent Nos.3 and 4, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Fire, appearing for respondent No.6, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Forest, appearing for respondent No.7. None appeared for respondent Nos.8 to 10. Ms.Sahithi Sri Kavya, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent No.11 is present. Perused the record.

3. The grievance of the petitioner pertains to the unlawful and illegitimate action of respondent No.10 in allotting a new Petrol Pump/Retail Outlet in favour of respondent No.11, in non-compliance with the guidelines, dated 26.06.2020 issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Road Transport and Highways (S&R) (P&B) Section, Transport Bhawan, 1, Parliament Street, New Delhi – 110001.

4. Upon careful perusal of the norms relating to the grant of permission for construction and other related matters, it is evident that the guidelines clearly specify the applicable location norms for rural stretches of National Highways. In the present case, the petitioner has obtained permission for construction of a retail outlet at Vennampalle Village, Srirampur Mandal, Peddapalli District, Telangana.

5. On examination of the material available on record, it is found that the distance between the fuel station of the petitioner and that of respondent No.10 is less than 50 meters, which does not conform to the norms prescribed under Section 2.2 of the relevant guidelines, which stipulate that the minimum distance between two fuel stations in rural areas on an undivided carriage way shall be 300 meters.

6. In view of the above factual position and the applicable guidelines, this Court does not find any valid ground to interfere in this writ petition on the relief sought for by the petitioner herein, in exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

7. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to work out the remedies in accordance with law.

Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top