IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY
BHARAT RAM NAGALA HYD AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
PRL SECY REVENUE DEPT HYD AND 6 OTHERS – Respondent
WP 3110/2016
##PAGE1##
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY
WRIT PETITION No.3110 of 2016
DATED:02.03.2026
Between:
Bharat Ram Nagala and another. …Petitioners
AND
The State of Telangana, Rep. by its
Principal Secretary,
Revenue Department,
Secretariat, Hyderabad and 6 others.
…Respondents
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed to declare the action of respondent
Nos.1 to 6 in allowing respondent No.7 to convert Mahadev Temple
land admeasuring 1861 Sq.mtrs, situated at premises bearing No.15-
1-652 to 656, T.S.No.21, Block J, Ward 49, Feelkhana, Begum Bazar,
Hyderabad (hereinafter referred to ‘subject property’), into respondent
No.7 private land as illegal, misuse of statutory power and public
property violating statutory laws and for consequential relief.
2. Heard Sri R.Steven Jaideep, learned Counsel for petitioners,
Sri M.Arun Kumar, learned Standing Counsel for GHMC, learned
##PAGE2##LNA,J
W.P.No.3110 of 2016
2
Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue and learned Government
Pleader for Endowments.
3. Brief facts of the case as averred in the writ affidavit are that
originally, the subject property was recorded as Government Temple
Land in revenue records and in the said land, there was an ancient
temple of Bhola Shankar, which was constructed 300 years back and
the same was being looked after by a pujari by name Savairam Gosai;
that the said Savairam Gosai left to Kasi by appointing Rameshwarji
as Pujari to look after the temple and its attached properties; that the
said Rameshwarji blessed with one son i.e., respondent No.7 and 3
daughters; that after the death of Rameshwarji in the year 1983, the
respondent No.7 with a mala fide intention to grab the temple land,
has created a gift deed vide document No.1080 of 1959, dated
21.09.1959, alleged to have been executed by his father Rameshwarji
in his favour and his mother; that the said temple and the adjacent
land admeasuring 791 Sq.mtrs was covered by a compound wall and
was registered as a public temple under the A.P. Religious and
Charitable Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987 (for short,
hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). As per the registered Muntakhab,
Rameshwarji was the possessor and Mutawalli and after his death,
respondent No.7 was continuing as hereditary Mutawalli and Pujari
##PAGE3##LNA,J
W.P.No.3110 of 2016
3
of the temple; that the mother of respondent No.7 expired on
11.11.1982, thereupon, the sisters of respondent No.7 inherited her
half share and all of them are in joint possession of the subject
property.
4. It is further averred that as there were occupants in the temple
area, respondent No.7 and his mother filed eviction petition vide
R.C.No.206 of 1981, before the Rent Controller and the same was
allowed and the occupants were evicted in the year 1983; that in the
year 1997, when respondent No.7 came to know that pattas were
being granted to the occupants of subject property, he filed
W.P.No.9249 of 1997, before this Court and the same was allowed by
this Court by Order dated 20.08.1998, holding that the said land is
the temple land and Government has no right to issue pattas to the
landless poor.
5. It is further averred that petitioners herein are the residents of
in and around the surroundings of the subject temple; that as the
original pujari of the temple Savairam Gosai was not the title holder
of the temple land, the question of inheritance by respondent No.7 on
the alleged ground of adoption does not arise; that in all the revenue
records, including Town Survey Register, the said land was notified
##PAGE4##LNA,J
W.P.No.3110 of 2016
4
as ‘G’ Temple Land in file No.A6/CA/450/2015 to an extent of 1861
mtrs; that on the application made by petitioner No.2, for furnishing
details of the subject property, the respondent No.5 issued a Memo in
letter No.B/3511/2015, dated 14.04.2015, stating that ‘as per TSLR
records the premises No.15-1-652 to 656 recorded as “G Temple” and
the extent was mentioned as 1861 Sq.mtrs’; that respondent No.7 in
collusion with Endowm
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.