2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 9604
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR
Kasarla Prabakar Reddy – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 6365/2026
##PAGE1##
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No.6365 of 2026
DATE OF ORDER: 02.03.2026
Between:
Kasarla Prabakar Reddy, S/o. Ram Reddy
...Petitioner
AND
The State of Telangana,
Rep. by its Principal Secretary,
Municipal Administration & Urban Development
Department,
Secretariat, Hyderabad & 3 Others
...Respondents
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed questioning the action of respondent
Nos.2 and 3 in not considering the petitioner’s representation dated
05.12.2025. A consequential prayer is sought to direct respondent
Nos.2 and 3 to consider the said representation.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is
a senior citizen and claims to be the owner of the house property
bearing H.No.2-7-720, Central Excise Colony, Subedari,
Hanumakonda, which was purchased by way of a registered sale deed
bearing document No.3543 of 1974, dated 25.09.1974 registered at
##PAGE2##2
Joint Sub-Registrar Officer, Warangal. After obtaining permission
from Warangal Municipal Corporation vide permission dated
18.01.1978, the petitioner constructed the house in his plot within the
boundaries of his plot and has constructed a compound wall within
the boundaries as specified in the sale deed of layout plot. It is
further submitted that land of respondent No.4 – The Officers’ Club,
Hanumakonda, is situated on the southern side of the petitioner’s
property. Subsequently, some laborers engaged by respondent No.4
entered into the petitioner’s property without issuing any prior notice
and demolished the petitioner’s compound wall. The petitioner also
requested the Secretary of respondent No.4 Club to stop the
demolition, but the respondent No.4 is going ahead with the
construction without looking into the documents of title in respect of
the petitioner’s property. Aggrieved by the action of respondent No.4,
the petitioner made a representation to respondent No.2 – The
Commissioner, Greater Warangal Municipal Corporation (for short
“GWMC”) requesting to take action against the illegal construction
being undertaken by respondent No.4. But till date, no action has
been initiated. Questioning the same, the present writ petition is filed.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that since
petitioner’s representation dated 05.12.2025 is still pending for
consideration, the respondent authorities may be directed to consider
the same and take action in a time bound period.
##PAGE3##3
4. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr.
Pasham Mohith, learned Standing Counsel for GWMC, submits that
the petitioner’s representation dated 05.12.2025 will be considered, if
not already considered, and appropriate action would be initiated, in
accordance with law, and prays this Court to pass appropriate orders.
5. Mr. M.Sahas Reddy, learned Assistant Government Pleader for
Revenue takes notice on behalf of respondent No.3.
6. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel
appearing for respondent No.2 and perused the material made
available on the record.
7. Since this Court, time and again, directed the Municipal
Authorities to initiate action against the illegal constructions by
following due process of law, it is noticed that the authorities are
failing to initiate action against the illegal constructions. However, in
some of the cases, authorities are issuing statutory notices and
thereafter not proceeding further to initiate further course of action
unless writ petitions are filed for not considering complaints/
representations made to civic authorities.
8. It is not out of place to mention Section 7(6) of the Telangana
State Building Permission Approval and Self Certification System (TS-
bPASS) Act, 2020 (for short ‘the TS-bPASS Act’) and Section 174(5) of
the Telangana Municipalities Act, 2019 encourages citizens to put on
##PAGE4##4
notice to the Civic Authorities regarding unauthorized constructions.
Section 7(6) of the TS-bPASS Act is extracted for reference.
“7. Approval of Buildin