IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
Smt.Abdul Raheemunnisa Begum – Appellant
Versus
Sri Adarsh Surabhi – Respondent
CC 414/2026
##PAGE1##
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY
Contempt Case No.414 of 2026
Date: 27.02.2026
Between:
Smt. Abdul Raheemunnisa Begum
…..Petitioner
AND
Sri Adarsh Surabhi and two others.
….Respondents
ORDER
This Contempt Case is filed alleging non-compliance of the order
dated 20.02.2025 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.5183 of
2025.
2. This Court vide order dated 20.02.2025 disposed of
W.P.No.5183 of 2025, with the following directions:
“6. In view of the above submissions, this Court, deems it appropriate to
dispose of the writ petition permitting the petitioner to submit an application
by duly enclosing all the necessary documents as required under Section 6
of the Act, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of
this order, for granting succession certificate and for consequential mutation
of her name in the revenue records and issuance of pattadar passbook. In
the event if the petitioner submits an application fulfilling all the
requirements mentioned in CCLA’s circular No.1 of 2021, dated 15.01.2021
##PAGE2##2
and Circular No.1 of 2024, dated 28.02.2024, respondent No.4 is directed to
consider the said application, after issuing notices to the petitioner and all
the interested/concerned parties and if the petitioner is otherwise not
eligible, pass a reasoned order within a period of three (3) months from the
date of receipt of a copy of this order and communicate the same to the
petitioner.”
3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for
the respondents has submitted that in pursuance of the orders dated
20.02.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.No.5183 of 2025, the
respondents have examined the application of the petitioner and the
same was rejected by the respondent No.2 vide Proceedings
No.E/Bhubharathi/24/2026 dated 02.01.2026. A copy of the said
proceedings is placed on record.
4. The relevant portion of the said proceedings reads as follows:
“On verification of documents, based on the Tahsildar, Ghanpur proceeding
No.B/457/2025, Dt.06.01.2026 and reasons explained, considering the
objections vide ref.4 & 5, the land in land in 97/అ/3 to an extent of Ac.2.30
Gts., situated within the limits of Ghanpur Village of Ghanpur Mandal
Application No.2500618358 for succession is hereby Reject.”
5. In view of the above, it cannot be held that the respondents have
willfully or deliberately disobeyed the order of this Court so as to invoke
the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
##PAGE3##3
6. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed. However, if the
petitioner is aggrieved by the proceedings dated 02.01.2026, she is at
liberty to challenge the same before appropriate forum, in accordance
with law, if so advised.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
_________________________________
JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY
Date: 27.02.2026
Bw
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.