IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No.6098 of 2026 DATE OF ORDER: 26.02.2026 Between:

Evuri Chittemma and 4 others ...Petitioners AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad, and 4 others ...Respondents

ORDER :

This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed seeking the following relief:

“….to direct the 3rd respondent not to interfere into the civil disputes between the petitioners and respondents No.4 and 5 pertaining to the agricultural land admeasuring Ac.2.00 guntas situated in Sy No 226/LUU/1 admeasuring Ac.1.00 guntas situated in Sy.No.226/LUU/2 and admeasuring Ac.1.00 guntas situated in Sy.No.243/Aa of Chinnakorukondi Village, Kalluru Mandal, Khammam District, without following due process of law pending disposal of Writ petition.…”

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the agricultural land admeasuring Ac. 2.00 guntas situated in situated in Sy.No. 243/Aa of Chinnakorukondi Village, Kalluru Mandal, Khammam District (hereinafter called as the subject property), is an ancestral property between the petitioners and respondents 4 and 5, who are husband and wife respectively. When disputes arose between the petitioners and respondents 4 and 5, respondent Nos.4 and 5 have approached respondent No.3 to settle the said civil disputes and on the basis of the same, respondent No.3 without disclosing any authority of law, without having any orders from any competent court or from any superior authority, interfered with the civil disputes and called the petitioners to the police. Hence this writ petition.

3. Mr. M.Srinivas, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 3 on instructions would submit that on 17.02.2026 petitioner No.5 lodged a complaint against respondent Nos.4 and 5, and on the same day, respondent No.5 lodged a complaint against the petitioners. On receipt of the both complaints, the respondent No.3 made GD entries, visited the scene of crime for preliminary enquiry and after completion of preliminary enquiry, respondent No.3 advised both parties not to quarrel over the issue in the village and directed to furnish the relevant documents relating to disputed land for taking further action in this regard. But without furnishing relevant documents relating to dispute land, the petitioners have approached this Court. It is further submitted that the respondent authorities have not interfered with the civil disputes between the petitioners and respondent Nos.4 and 5 as alleged by the petitioners. Hence, this writ petition is not maintainable and seeks to dismiss the writ petition.

4. Recording the submissions of learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, this writ petition is disposed of directing respondent No.3 to follow due process of law before taking any action against the petitioners. No order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending, shall stand closed.

____________________ E.V.VENUGOPAL, J Dated: 26.02.2026 sus