I N THE HI GH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO DATE: 24.02.2026 CI VI L REVI SI ON PETI TI ON No.2975 OF 2025 Between:

Smt. Khizra Rafia [

…Petitioner/ Respondent AND Sri Mohd Samiullah …Respondent/ Petitioner

ORDER

This Civil Revision Petition is filed aggrieved by the order and decree dated 15.07.2025 passed in I.A.No.972 of 2025 in O.P.No.991 of 2024 on the file of the Principal Family Court-cum-XIII Additional Metropolitan Sessions Court at Hyderabad.

2. Heard Mr. Mohd Ifteqar Ali, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. B.A. Prakash Reddy, learned counsel for the respondent. Perused the material on record.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent had filed the impugned application seeking visitation rights on days convenient to him. The respondent also sought a direction requiring the petitioner to produce the minor child, namely Mohammad Rahmuthullah Maaz (DOB: 09.12.2021), initially till the disposal of the main petition, and requested that he be allowed to meet the child within the Court premises from 11:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. on Friday, Saturday, and Sunday. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the trial Court, by order dated 15.07.2025 in I.A.No.972 of 2025 in O.P.No.991 of 2024, partly allowed the application and granted visitation rights to the respondent-father, permitting him to visit the minor child every Saturday in a month from 3:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. at the Court premises. Aggrieved by the said order, the present Civil Revision Petition has been filed.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that while interacting with the child, the respondent-father was allegedly making calls to other persons who have no connection either with the case, the child, or the petitioner.

6. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that, under the guise of the pending Civil Revision Petition, the petitioner on several occasions has failed to bring the child to the Court premises, thereby obstructed the visitation rights.

7. Considering the rival submissions made by the learned counsel for the respective parties and keeping in mind the welfare of the minor child, this Court is of the view that the visitation rights granted by the trial Court should continue, subject to certain conditions as detailed below to safeguards the child’s interest.

(i) The respondent is directed to meet his minor child, Mohammad Rahmuthullah Maaz, every Saturday from 3:00 P.M. to 5:00 P.M. at the Court premises.

(ii) While interacting with the child, the respondent is directed not to use any mobile phone. In case of violation, the petitioner is at liberty to file a complaint before the trial Court.

(iii) If the respondent wishes to take photographs of the child during visitation rights, the petitioner shall not object for such limited extent.

8. With the above directions, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of.

There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, in this Civil Revision Petition, shall stand closed.

___________________________ NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO, J Date: 24.02.2026 HFM