SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 10349

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI
T. Sandhya Rani – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 27078/2019



IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI DATE: 23.02.2026 Between :

T. Sandhya Rani … Petitioner AND The State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Secretariat Building, Hyderabad, and five others.

… Respondents.

O R D E R:

This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:

“…to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.3 not conducting the fair investigation in Crime No. 620 of 2019 dated 22-07-2019 has illegal, arbitrary and violation of Articles 14, 21 of Constitution of India and pass such other or order or orders…”

2. None appeared on behalf of the petitioner.

3. Mr. D. Pradeep, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 4, submits that, upon due investigation in Crime No. 620 of 2019 of Vanasthalipuram Police Station, Rachakonda Commissionerate, the police filed a final report before the learned Special Sessions Judge for Trial of Cases under the SCs and STs (POA) Act, 1989-cum-VII Additional District and Sessions Judge, Cyberabad, Ranga Reddy District, classifying the case as “false” on 29.12.2020. He contends that, in view of the said development, the petitioner’s allegations are devoid of any foundation and accordingly prays for dismissal of the petition.

4. I have perused the material available on record.

5. The grievance of the petitioner is that respondent No. 3 has not conducted a fair investigation in Crime No. 620 of 2019. However, the developments in the said crime, as reported by the learned Assistant Government Pleader, indicate that the matter was duly investigated and that a final report was filed, upon which the proceedings were closed. In such circumstances, the allegation of failure to conduct investigation is unfounded.

6. In this view of the matter, it is evident that the petitioner’s grievance stands effectively addressed by the respondents/police authorities, and no further issue survives for consideration warranting any direction from this Court. Nevertheless, reserving liberty to the petitioner to avail appropriate remedies, if any, against the final report before the competent Magistrate in accordance with law, should the cause still subsist, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.

_______________ N.TUKARAMJI, J Date: 23.02.2026 svl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top