IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI WRIT PETITION No.4470 OF 2026

13^th February, 2026 Between:

Mr Asim Jameel Kaseri.

…Petitioner AND The State of Telangana and 2 Others.

…Respondents

ORDER:

This Writ Petition is filed with the following relief:

“…pleased to pass an order, direction or a writ particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the action on part of the respondent No.3 in attempting to dispossess the petitioner from his land under Sy. No. 83LU3/2/1, admn. 0.0750 guntas and land under Sy. No. 83LU3/1/1, admn. 0.1150 guntas, total 0.1900 guntas, situated at Reddipalli Village, Moinabad Mandal, RR District, without following the due process of law, is highly illegal, arbitrary, in violation of principles of natural justice and Article 300 A of the Constitution of India. Consequently, this Honble Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No. 3 not to interfere with the peaceful possession of the petitioner in respect of his land land under Sy. No. 83LU3/2/1, admn.

0.0750 guntas and land under Sy. No. 83LU3/1/1, admn.......”

2. Heard Mr.Mohammad Adnan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.M.Srinivas, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 3.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent No. 3 is attempting to dispossess the petitioner from the petition schedule property and is interfering with his peaceful possession without any lawful authority. Accordingly, the present writ petition has been filed seeking appropriate directions.

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, submits that respondent No. 3 is conducting an enquiry based on the representation submitted by the petitioner. However, the allegations that respondent No. 3 is interfering with the petitioner’s possession, attempting to dispossess him, or threatening him are specifically denied as being without any basis. It is further submitted that the respondent police are acting strictly within the bounds of law. Accordingly, dismissal of the writ petition is sought.

5. I have perused the material available on record.

6. The petitioner, in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, has specifically asserted that respondent No. 3 is interfering with his possession and attempting to dispossess him without any lawful justification.

7. Having regard to the submissions made and keeping in view the limitations on the powers of the police, particularly in matters essentially civil in nature, respondent No. 3 is directed to refrain from interfering with the peaceful possession of the petitioner over the petition schedule property. The respondent police authorities shall not, in any manner, attempt to dispossess the petitioner or interfere with his life and liberty, except in strict accordance with law and by following due process.

8. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of.

There shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.

__________________ N.TUKARAMJI, J Date: 13.02.2026.

mmr THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI WRIT PETITION No.4470 of 2026 Dated: 13.02.2026 mmr