SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 10890

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO
Munigala Rajesham – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 24750/2015



IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO WRIT PETITION No.24750 of 2015 DATE: 11.02.2026 Between:

Munigala Rajesham …Petitioner AND The State of Telangana, Rep., by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration &

Urban Development Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad & others.

…Respondents

ORDER:

This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking the following relief:-

“…to issue Writ, or Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents not to demolish petitioner’s H.No.1-8-69/A, together with Post Office, situated at Golconda Street, Medak town and District, under the guise of road widening, deviating from the Centre Point of old road by declaring the proceedings No.C/236/2002-15, dated 21.07.2015, on the file of 2nd respondent, as arbitrary, illegal and violativce of Article 14, 300-A of the Constitution of India..”.

petitioner; Sri Putta Krishna Reddy, learned Standing Counsel and learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent No.3. Perused the record.

3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Standing Counsel along with the learned Assistant Government Pleader for respondent No.3 would contend that as on today, there is no proposal for road widening as alleged by the petitioner.

4. In view of the above, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing respondent Nos.1 to 3 to initiate proceedings under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, in the event of they proceeding with the road widening affecting the subject property of the petitioner, issue notice to the petitioner and other affected parties, and take possession of the property after paying compensation in accordance with the provisions of the said Act. There shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any are pending, shall stand closed.

_________________________________ SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO, J

4776 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO WRIT PETITION No.24750 of 2015

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top