SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 10946

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO
Jalli Yadaia – Appellant
Versus
The Government of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
WP 22581/2014



I N THE HI GH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO WRI T PETI TI ON No.22581 of 2014 DATE: 10.02.2026 Between:

Sri Jalli Yadaiah and others …Petitioners AND The Government of Andhra Pradesh and others …Respondents

O R D E R:

Heard Sri Praveen Kumar Veerjala, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri V. Narasimha Goud, learned Standing Counsel for HMDA appearing for respondent No.2, Sri Laxmaiah Kanchani, learned Standing Counsel for Shamshabad, Turkayamjal, Manikonda, Narsingi Municipalities and Sri Subrahmanyam Kurella, learned counsel for respondent No.3.

2. The petitioners approached the Court seeking prayer as under:

“to issue Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of the Respondent Nos.2 and 3 in taking action against the Respondent No.4 illegal construction in Sy.No.478, Manchirevula Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District as illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the 2nd and 3rd respondents to demolish the illegal construction undertaken by the 4th respondent and pass orders.”

3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the writ petitioners had made a specific representation to respondent No.3, but no action has been taken.

4. The counter-affidavit filed by respondent No.4 states that the date of the representation was not mentioned by the petitioners.

5. In view of the same, this Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the writ petitioners to submit a proper representation to the official respondents along with relevant records, clearly showing how the illegal construction is being carried out and the respondents shall pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, after giving an opportunity of personal hearing to all the concerned and take action thereby. There shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any are pending, shall stand closed.

___________________________ SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO, J Date: 10.02.2026

Dsu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top