##PAGE1##

I N THE HI GH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO

CI VI L REVI SI ON PETI TI ON No.918 OF 2025

DATE: 05.02.2026

Betw een:

Smt. P. Nagarani and others

…Petitioners

AND

Sri Prodduturi Ravi Kumar and others.

…Respondents

ORDER

The Civil Revision Petition is filed aggrieved by the order,

dated 04.09.2024 passed in I.A.No.160 of 2024 in O.S.No.246

of 2014 by the learned XI Additional District & Sessions Judge,

L.B. Nagar, Ranga Reddy District (for short ‘trial Court’),

whereby, the application filed by the petitioners seeking to club

O.S.No.246 of 2014 and O.S.No.936 of 2019, for the purpose of

conducting a joint trial, was dismissed.

2. Heard Sri Koka Satyanarayana Rao, learned counsel for

the petitioners, Sri K. Sreenivas, learned counsel for respondent

No.1 and Ms.T.Dhanalakshmi, learned counsel for respondent

No.3.

2

3. Brief facts of the case are that, I.A.No.160 of 2024 was

filed by the petitioners/defendants Nos.8 to 12, seeking to club

O.S.No.246 of 2014 and O.S.No.936 of 2019, for the purpose of

conducting a joint trial. The father of petitioner namely

Mr. P.Chandraiah is defendant No.6 and respondent Nos.1, 3 to

10 are the own brothers and sisters, being the children of

Mr. P.Narasimhulu i.e., respondent No.2/defendant No.1.

Respondent No.2 herein is the original owner of agricultural

land called “ISUKABAYI LAND” admeasuring Ac.3.33 gts. in

Sy.No.342, Ac.2.19 gts. in Sy.No.343, Ac.1.11 gts. in

Sy.No.344, Ac.0.30 gts. in Sy.No.345, Ac.0.09 gts in

Sy.No.374, Ac.0.10 gts. in Sy.No.375, Ac.0.31 gts. in

Sy.No.349/AA and Ac.0.33 gts in Sy.No.350, totally

admeasuring Ac.10.16 gts. situated at Maheshwaram Village

and Mandal, Ranga Reddy District (hereinafter referred to as

‘suit schedule property’).

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that a suit for

partition in respect of the suit schedule property vide

O.S.No.246 of 2014 was filed and another suit vide O.S.No.936

of 2019 was filed by the petitioners herein seeking specific

performance of the Agreement, dated 18.11.2001. Both the

suits were sought to be clubbed vide I.A.No.160 of 2024, but

3

the same was dismissed by the trial Court. Learned counsel for

the petitioner further submits that the suit schedule properties

in both the suits are one and the same, and the joint trial of

both the suits would be advantageous for objective and just

decisions of the matters, as they are interrelated and connected

with one another. Hence, prayed to set aside the impugned

order.

5. A perusal of the record shows that the trial Court, while

dismissing the application in I.A.No.160 of 2024 in O.S.No.246

of 2014 by the learned XI Additional District & Sessions Judge,

L.B. Nagar, Ranga Reddy District, observed as under:

“It is quite obvious even if the trial is held

separately and separate judgments gets rendered,

it does not lead to conflicting judgments and it

does not cause any prejudice as such to neither of

the parties. Rather clubbing of the suits does not

in any manner would be advantageous to neither

of the parties nor does it facilitate this Court for

earlier disposal of the suit, nor would be

advantageous for objective and just decision of the

subject matter there the scope and nature of

enquire in both the suits is distinct and different.

So viewed from any of the stand points, there does

not seem any element or ground for clubbing of

the suits for the purpose of joint trial. Accordingly

petition is devoid of merit and force and is liable to

be dismissed.”

4

6. The trial Court duly considered the advantages and

disadvantages of clubbing the suits, as well as proceeding with

them separately. Upon such consideration, it rightly concluded

that clubbing the suits in any manner would neither benefit the

parties nor facilitate the expeditious disposal of the cases. The

impugned order does not suffer from any illegality or infirmity.

7. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed by

confirming the order of the trial Court in I.A.No.160 of 2024 in

O.S.