2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 11048
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO
Smt. Rukmini Devi Educational Trust a registered Trust – Appellant
Versus
Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation (GHMC) – Respondent
WP 41175/2014
##PAGE1##
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO
WRIT PETITION No.41175 of 2014
DATE: 05.02.2026
Between:
Smt. Rukmini Devi Educational Trust
& another
…Petitioners
AND
The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation,
(GHMC), Circle No.10, Tank Bund, Hyderabad,
Represented by the Commissioner.
…Respondent
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of
Constitution of India seeking the following relief:-
“…to issue a Writ of Mandamus or other appropriate
order or direction in the nature of a Writ declaring the
impugned notice bearing SI.No.4945, Book No.50, dated
22.12.2014 issued by Respondent as arbitrary,
discriminatory, without jurisdiction and violative of
Articles 14 and 19 (1) (a) of the Constitution of India and
null and void, abinitio and consequently restrain the
respondent from giving effect to the same in the interest
of justice and pass such other order or orders…”
##PAGE2##2
WP.No.41175_2014
SCR, J
2. Heard Sri T. Amarnath, learned counsel representing Sri
B. Nalin Kumar, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners and
Sri Midde Arun Kumar, learned Standing Counsel for GHMC,
for the respondent. Perused the record.
3. The instant writ petition has been filed questioning the
notice dated 22.12.2014 purportedly issued under Sections
521 and 622(4) of the Greater Hyderabad Municipal
Corporation Act, 1955, wherein the petitioners, who are
imparting education by running a School have been called
upon to register their trade through Online CSC at circle office
or Mee-Seva and obtain/renew the license within seven days
from the date of receipt of the said notice, by paying an amount
of Rs.30,70,20/- towards license fees in the shape of Demand
Draft (DD) drawn in favour of the Commissioner of GHMC.
4. The case of the petitioners is that, the petitioners are the
Society, who are running the School from Nursery to 10th
Class, under Educational Trust by obtaining appropriate
permission from the competent authorities and affiliated to
Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) vide proceedings
bearing No.CBSE/Aff/130345-SC-00894-1415/727487 dated
##PAGE3##3
WP.No.41175_2014
SCR, J
24.06.2014 the 2nd respondent has a strength of 400 students
and around 50 staff members, both teaching and non teaching
staff.
5. The petitioners have been running a School at premises
H.No.8-2-404 & 404/1, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, from the
year 2012. While so, the impugned notice has been issued by
the GHMC, directing the petitioners to obtain trade license,
contending that they are falling under Article 19(1) (g) of the
Constitution of India and the said School is coming under the
activities of trade or a business and the said notice has been
admittedly issued under Section 521 of GHMC Act and it
envisages that the license should be obtained, however, it does
not specify whether it is covered by Schedule ‘P’ to GHMC Act.
Further, as per Section 521 of the GHMC Act, 521 - certain
things not to be kept and certain trades and operations not to
be carried on, without a license - (i) any of the trades or
operations connected with trade specified in Part IV of
Schedule ‘P’; (ii) any trade or operation which, in the opinion of
the Commissioner, is dangerous to life, health or property, or
likely to create a nuisance either from its nature, or by reason
##PAGE4##4
WP.No.41175_2014
SCR, J
of the manner in which, or the conditions under which, the
same is or is proposed to be carried on.
6. Section 622 of the GHMC Act envisages the
Commissioner to grant trade licenses by following due
procedure. Admittedly, the petitioner-Society is running the
School by imparting the Education from Nursery to 10th class
and by collecting appropriate structured fee in pursuance of
the statutes.
7. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners would contend
that the very school is not a commercial activity as envisaged
under Article 19(1) (g) of the Constitution of India, wherein, to
practice any profession, or to carry on any occupation, trade or
business.
8. For better appreciation of