IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE RENUKA YARA
Dr. Vulese Sharanya – Appellant
Versus
Putta Naresh Reddy – Respondent
TRCMP 418/2025
##PAGE1##
1
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE RENUKA YARA
TR.C.M.P.No.418 of 2025
DATE: 04.02.2026
Between:
Dr. Vulese Sai Sharanya
… Petitioner
AND
Putta Naresh Reddy
…Respondent
ORDER:
Heard Sri S.Someshwar Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri
Kongara Raj Kumar, learned counsel for the respondent.
2. This Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed by the petitioner
seeking transfer of G.W.O.P.No.23 of 2025 pending on the file of the learned
VI Additional District and Sessions Judge, Kukatpally, Ranga Reddy District,
to the file of the learned Judge, I Additional Family Court-cum-XIV
Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad.
3. The brief facts of the case are that the marriage between the petitioner
and respondent took place on 20.07.2016 as per Hindu rights and customs
and they were blessed with a boy viz., Arnav Shourya. Thereafter, disputes
##PAGE2##2
arose between them and hence, the respondent has filed FCOP No.1335 of
2021 under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, seeking dissolution
vide
of marriage by way of mutual consent and the same was allowed order
dated 20.04.2023. Subsequently, the respondent has filed G.W.O.P.No.23 of
2025 under Sections 7, 10 & 25 of the Guardian and Wards Act read with
Section 7 of Family Court Act ( for short the Act) seeking custody of the
minor Arnav Shourya and the said GWOP is pending on the file of the
learned VI Additional District and Sessions Judge, Kukatpally. Hence, the
petitioner-wife sought transfer of the said GWOP.
4. The respondent has filed counter-affidavit opposing transfer of the said
GWOP.
5. Learned counsel for the respondent contended that earlier the
petitioner practicised at Adikmet and thereafter, she has shifted her residence
from Adikmet and now, she is pracitising at Sigma Hospitals, Madhapur. The
child viz., Arnav Shourya is studying at EuroKids Pre School, Khajaguda,
Ranga Reddy District. Learned counsel further contended that the respondent
is also practicising as a Dermatologist at Nallagandla. To sum up, it is stated
that both the petitioner and respondent are residing and practicising at
Madhapur and Nallagandla, which fall with the jurisdiction of VI Additional
District and Sessions Judge at Kukatpally.
##PAGE3##3
6. The petitioner has filed an additional affidavit dated 02.02.2026 stating
that she is residing at H.No.1-9-277/18, near Ramanagar gundu, Adikmet,
Hyderabad. Further, it is stated that in the cause title of the present Tr.CMP,
the address of the petitioner is mentioned as Flat No.B2-911, Niharika
Exotica, Lanco Hills Road, Khajaguda, which is her in-laws address and that
the said address is also mentioned in the cause title of GWOP filed by the
respondent. But, actually, the petitioner is residing at H.No.1-9-277/18, near
Ramanagar gundu, Adikmet, Hyderabad. In proof of the said address at
Adikmet, the petitioner has furnished copies of her Aadhar card, Voter Card,
Driving License, Passport and details of Fixed line and Airtel WIFI service
bills.
7. Learned counsel for the respondent contended that the Aadhar card of
the minor should be produced before this Court to ascertain the place of
residence of the minor.
8. Having regard to the above set of facts stated by the petitioner as well
as respondent, it is seen that the claim of the petitioner is that she copied the
cause title of GWOP in the Tr.CMP and the cause title shows her address at
Lanco Hills, Khajaguda, which is her in-laws house.
##PAGE4##4
9. Coming to the case of the respondent, as stated in the counter, the first
claim is that petitioner is residing at Lanco Hills, Khajaguda, which is disputed
by the petitioner.
10. The second claim is that the child is studying at EuroKids Pre School,
Khajaguda. The location of the school, where a minor is studying, does not
determine the jurisdiction; rather under Section 9 of the Act, residence of the
minor determines the jurisdiction.
11. The third claim is that the petitioner and the respondent are working in
Nallagandla, which
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.