SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 77212

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE RENUKA YARA
DR.SHAKEEL HAIDER KHAN – Appellant
Versus
Smt. B.Nirmala – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE RENUKA YARA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2177 of 2024

30th DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 Between:

Dr. Shakeel Haider Khan.

…Petitioner AND Smt. B. Nirmala and 13 others.

...Respondents

ORDER:

Heard Sri Mohammed Sanaullah Farhan, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Sridhar Lonkala, learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2 and M/s.Indus Law Firm, learned counsel for respondent Nos.12 to 14.

Perused the entire record.

2. The present revision is preferred by the revision petitioner/proposed plaintiff No.3 aggrieved by the order passed by the learned VI Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy at Kukatpally (‘trial Court’), in I.A.No.469 of 2022 in O.S.No.1517 of 2018 dated 15.04.2024, wherein a petition filed under Order I Rule 10 of CPC read with Section 151 CPC for impleading the revision petitioner as party to the suit i.e., plaintiff No.3 has been dismissed.

3. The background facts leading to filing of the interlocutory application and the revision are that respondent Nos.1 and 2/plaintiffs have filed a suit for partition and separate possession of the suit schedule property consisting of land admeasuring Ac.0-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top