IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY,THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
M. Bhaskar – Appellant
Versus
The Honorable High Court of Telangana – Respondent
WP 9073/2026
##PAGE1##
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
Writ Petition No.9073 of 2026 Dated: 02.04.2026
Between:
M.Bhaskar …Petitioner AND
The High Court of Telangana, State of Telangana,
Rep by its Registrar General & another.
…Respondents
ORDER : (per Hon’ble Sri Justice P.Sam Koshy)
Heard Mr.T.Surya Satish, learned counsel for the petitioner
and Mr.G.Vidya Sagar, learned senior counsel representing Ms.K.Udaya Sri, learned counsel for the respondents. Perused the
record.
2. The grievance of the petitioner in the present writ
petition is prolonged placement under suspension.
##PAGE2##2
3. The petitioner in the instant case stands suspended way
back on 31.08.2023, as such the petitioner is now under suspension for more than 2 ½ years. The disciplinary proceedings that has initiated, according to the petitioner, is proceeding at a
slow pace detrimental to the interest of the petitioner.
4. The learned senior counsel for the respondents also
contends that the enquiry as of now has been expedited and out of the total 25 witnesses cited, 17 have already been examined and only 8 more are left. Learned senior counsel further submits that the last extension of the suspension period of the petitioner was on 27.02.2026 for a period of further six (6) months which would be completed on 26.08.2026. According to the learned senior counsel, in all probability, the enquiry should conclude within fresh extended period. All efforts are being made to ensure the conclusion of the disciplinary proceedings before the fresh
extension that has now been granted on 27.02.2026.
5. In view of the submission made by learned senior
counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents and also taking
##PAGE3##3
note of the present position of the disciplinary proceedings where 17 out of 25 witnesses has already been examined, we are of the considered opinion that at this juncture, it would not be proper for this Bench to make any observation or pass any order so far as period of the suspension is concerned. However, we direct the respondents to ensure that the disciplinary proceeding initiated must be expedited and ensure that the disciplinary proceedings
stands concluded within fresh extended period.
6. Accordingly, with the above observations, this writ
petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall
stand closed.
_____________________
P.SAM KOSHY, J
_________________________________
NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA, J
02.04.2026
mrm
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.