IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No.10025 of 2026 Date: 06.04.2026 Between:

Naser Salahuddin Qureshi and another ..Petitioners And The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Building, Hyderabad and 6 others ..Respondents

ORDER

This Writ Petition is filed seeking the following relief:-

“…to declare the action of the respondent Nos.2 to 5 in not considering and acting upon the representation of the petitioner dated 27.02.2026 and 07.03.2026 and in not providing police aid and protection for effective implementation of the Judgment and Decree dated 03.01.2023 passed in O.S.No.2272 of 2018, on the file of the Court of the IV Additional Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District, in respect of agricultural dry land admeasuring Ac.05.37 guntas, in Survey No.745, situated at Shamshabad Village and Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India, and consequently to direct the respondents, more particularly respondent No.5, to provide necessary police aid and protection to the petitioners for implementation of the decree of perpetual injunction dated 03.01.2023 in O.S.No.2272 of 2018 and to ensure that respondent Nos.6 and 7 and their men do not interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner over the subject land i.e., agricultural dry land admeasuring Ac.05.37 guntas, in Survey No.745, situated at Shamshabad Village and Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.…”

2. Heard Sri Katika Ravinder Reddy, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Sri M.Srinivas, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 5 and perused the record.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are the lawful owners and possessors of agricultural land to an extent of Acs.5.37 guntas in Sy.No.745, situated at Shamshabad Village and Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. Petitioner No.1 owning Acs.2.3850 guntas and petitioner No.2 owning Acs.2.3850 guntas. Their ownership is derived from Khaleel-Ul-Rahman, the original owner, and both have been in continuous, peaceful possession of their respective shares. Respondent Nos.6 and 7, who had no legal claim over the land, repeatedly attempted to interfere with the petitioners’ possession, prompting petitioner No.1 to file O.S.No.2272 of 2018, which resulted in a decree granting perpetual injunction restraining such interference. Despite the decree, these respondents, along with their associates, have continued illegal attempts to trespass and threaten the petitioners. The petitioners submitted representations requesting police protection, but the authorities failed to act, thereby abdicating their statutory duty and indirectly aiding the trespassers. The petitioners seek a direction from this Court to compel respondent Nos.2 to 5, to provide necessary aid and protection to enforce the decree and ensure peaceful possession, as no other effective remedy exists and they face imminent irreparable loss.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner relied on the order dated 12.11.2025 passed by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in W.P. No.31735 of 2025, where the Court disposed of a writ petition by granting liberty to the petitioner to have their representation considered for implementation of a trial Court order under similar circumstances. In the present case, the petitioner submitted a detailed representation seeking police aid for enforcement of the decree, but no action has been taken by the official respondents. The petitioner, therefore, seeks appropriate directions from this Court directing respondent No.2 to consider the representation and provide necessary police protection.

5. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on instructions would submit that the petitioner submitted a representation dated 07.03.2026 to respondent No.5-Station House Office