SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 11741

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY
Vadlamudi P. Ranga Rao and 3 Others – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana and 3 Others – Respondent
WP 14019/2019



HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY WRIT PETITION No.14019 of 2019 DATE OF ORDER: 26.03.2026 BETWEEN:

Vadlamudi P.Ranga Rao and others … Petitioners AND The State of Telangana, rep. by its Prl.Secretary, and others.

… Respondents : ORDER :

This writ petition is filed to declare the action of respondent Nos.2 to 4 in not taking action against the individuals who have illegally cut the trees at Patelknta HMDA park, Kukatpally, Hyderabad, in pursuance of the representations submitted by the petitioners dated 10.12.2017 and 05.12.2017 along with other walkers of the Patelkunta HMDA park at Kukatpally and further the action of the respondent Nos.2 to 4 in not taking steps to preserve the patelkunta HMDA park and their proposed plan to cut some trees in the Patelkunta HMDA park, Kukatpally, Hyderabad, as illegal and arbitrary and for consequential relief.

2. Sri J.Ashvini Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri and 4, and Sri V.Narasimha Goud, learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.2, are present.

3. Learned Counsel for the petitioners would submit that this Court vide interim order dated 11.07.2019 had directed HMDA to ensure that no standing trees are cut and that the trees already cut shall not be removed.

4. Learned Standing Counsel for Respondent No.2 by referring to the counter would submit that subsequent to the filing of the writ petition the respondent No.2 has initiated disciplinary action against the Officer who was responsible for the cutting of trees; and that 40 saplings have been planted in the area where the existing trees were removed.

5. Learned Counsel for the petitioner would further submit that in view of the disciplinary action initiated against the Officer responsible for the cutting of trees, and also planting of saplings in place of the trees which were cut, no further orders are required to be passed.

6. In the light of submissions made by learned counsel for the Nos.2 to 4, the Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

___________________________________ LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY, J Date: 26.03.2026 tk

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top