SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 11989

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO
IBRAHIM JALEEL R.R. DIST. – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER G.H.M.C. HYD AND ANR – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD DATE: 18.03.2026 Between:

Ibrahim Jaleel …Petitioner AND Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Represented by its Commissioner, Hyderabad Having office at Tank bund Road Hyderabad and another …Respondents

ORDER:

Heard Mr. Syed Yasar Mamoon, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. Raparthi Venkatesh, learned Standing Counsel for GHMC appearing for the respondents.

2. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking the following relief:

“….to pass an order, direction or a writ particularly in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring that the action of the respondents in issuing the demolition order vide Order No.G-125/UC/CIR- 06/SZ/GHMC/2013, dated 14.5.2013 to demolish the petitioner’s House bearing 8-5-2/2/110/P, Maillardevpally Village, GHMC, Rajendranagar Circle, Ranga Reddy District, A.P., as illegal, arbitrary, nebulous, a result of non application of mind, ex facie illegal, in violation of principles of natural justice and in violation of provisions of HMC Act. Consequently, this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to extend the benefit of BPS scheme to the petitioner and to Regularise the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top