##PAGE1##

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY

WRIT PETITION No.18182 & 13358 of 2020

DATED: 30.03.2026 Between:

Goli Shailaja …Petitioner

AND

The Tahsildar, Chandur Revenue Mandal,

Chandur Town, Nalgonda District and others …Respondents

COMMON ORDER:

W.P.No.18182 of 2020 is filed to declare the action of

respondent No.1 in issuing proceedings Lr.No.C/2229/2019, dated 25.06.2020, rejecting the claim of the petitioner for mutation of land records in her favour in respect of land belonging to her father late Goli Maraiah, situated in Sy.Nos.95/AA & 96/A admeasuring Ac.1- 38 gts and Ac.1-37 gts respectively, situated at Uduthalapally Village, Chandur Mandal, Nalgonda District in the guise of false claim made by respondent Nos.5 to 8, as illegal, arbitrary and for consequential

relief.

2. W.P.No.13358 of 2020 is filed to declare the action of the respondent No.4 in issuing family members Certificate dated 03.03.2020, in favour of respondent Nos.5 to 7, as illegal, arbitrary

and for consequential relief.

LNA,J W.P.Nos.18182 & 13358 of 2020

2

3. Heard Sri Mohammed Adam, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue and Sri Kiran

Palakurthi, learned counsel for respondent Nos.5 to 8.

4. Since the parties in both the writ petitions are one and the same and the issue is interlinked, both the writ petitions are heard

together and are being disposed of by this Common Order.

5. For convenience, Writ Petition No.18182 of 2020 is taken as a

lead case insofar as the facts are concerned.

6. Brief facts of the case as averred in the writ affidavit are that petitioner’s father by name Goli Maraiah, was the absolute owner and possessor of lands admeasuring Ac.1-38 gts and Ac.1-37 gts, total admeasuring Acs.3-35 gts in Sy.Nos.95/AA & 96/A, of Uduthalapally Village, Chandur Mandal, Nalgonda District (hereinafter referred to as ‘subject property’); that petitioner’s father initially married to one Chandramma and she died on 07.02.2002, issueless and later, he married petitioner’s mother i.e., Yashoda; that after the death of Chandramma, petitioner’s father had also received family pension from the Government as she worked as kamati; that petitioner’s father expired on 30.08.2019 at petitioner’s residence i.e., H.No.6-1-165, Q.No.02, Municipal Quarters, Boyawada, Nalgonda Town due to old age; that during his life time, petitioner’s father executed a Will Deed in favour of the petitioner on 15.05.2019; that

LNA,J W.P.Nos.18182 & 13358 of 2020

3

petitioner made an application before respondent No.1 for mutation of his name in revenue records and issue pattadar passbook and title deed in her favour, but the same was rejected by respondent No.1 vide Lr.No.C/2229/2019, dated 25.06.2020 and directed her to approach competent Civil Court. Aggrieved by the same, petitioner

filed W.P.No.18182 of 2020.

7. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that respondent Nos.5 to 8 claiming to be the legal heirs of petitioner’s father made an application before Nalgonda Municipality and obtained death certificate of petitioner’s father with different address and also made an application before respondent No.1 and got mutated subject property in their favour on 09.12.2019; that petitioner made an application before municipal authorities for rectification of place of death in the death certificate; that municipal authorities after conducting enquiry and panchanama, cancelled the death certificate obtained by respondent No.5. He further submitted that Tahsildar, Nalgonda Mandal had issued Family Member Certificate to petitioner family members vide proceedings No.FAMC022000652409, dated 03.03.2020, basing on genuine certificates and rejected the application of respondent Nos.5 to 8 for issuance of family member certificate, but the respondent No.1 without considering the facts in proper perspective, rejected the petitioner’s application for mutation

vide impugned