SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 12114

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
Aparesh Kumar Singh, CJ, G.M. Mohiuddin, J
K. Anil Kumar Goud – Appellant
Versus
P. Venugopal Goud – Respondent
I.A.No.1 OF 2026|WRIT APPEAL No.375 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Vedula Srinivas, A.Raja Chandra Shekhar Goud
For the Respondents: K.V.Rusheek Reddy, A.Jagan, Syed Qadeer

A temporary appointee to a Person-in-Charge Committee for a co-operative society possesses no vested legal right to continue in office, and a court’s directive to statutory authorities to appoint a new committee to facilitate fresh elections does not require the impleadment of such interim appointees.

Headnote:(A) Telangana Co-operative Societies Act, 1964 - Section 32(7)(a) - Appointment of Person-in-Charge (PIC) Committee - Appellant challenged the order directing appointment of new PIC Committee claiming violation of natural justice as he was an existing Chairman - High Court held that the appointment of a PIC is a temporary administrative measure - The appellant had no vested right to continue as Chairman, especially when the underlying elections were set aside by the Tribunal - Appellate court will not interfere with findings of fact affirmed by the learned Single Judge unless there is perversity or patent error of law.

Facts of the case:
The appellant was appointed Chairman of a three-member PIC Committee to manage a Co-operative Society following resignation of elected members. Subsequently, the Co-operative Tribunal set aside the 2022 elections, and when the Learned Single Judge upheld this order and directed the appointment of a PIC Committee to conduct fresh elections, the appellant challenged the order, arguing he was not afforded an opportunity to be heard.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the appellant had no vested right in a temporary administrative appointment and that the direction to constitute a PIC committee to conduct fresh elections was lawful and mandatory following the annulment of the previous election.

Issues: Whether the appellant had a right to be heard before the court directed the authorities to constitute a new PIC committee to replace the existing one.

Ratio Decidendi: An administrative stop-gap arrangement, such as a PIC committee, confers no vested legal right to remain in office, and the court’s general mandate to statutory authorities to hold elections pursuant to the annulment of an election process does not require impleading every interim appointee as a party.

Result: Appeal dismissed.

Table of Content
1. procedural history of election disputes and pic appointments. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
2. parties' contentions regarding the challenge to the pic committee. (Para 12 , 13)
3. temporary nature of pic appointments and lack of vested rights. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23)
4. final dismissal of the appeal due to lack of merit. (Para 24 , 25)

JUDGMENT

Heard Sri Vedula Srinivas, learned Senior Counsel representing Sri A.Raja Chandra Shekhar Goud, learned counsel for the appellant; Sri K.V.Rusheek Reddy, learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 3; Sri A.Jagan, learned Government Pleader for Prohibition & Excise appearing for respondent No.4; Sri Syed Qadeer, learned Government Pleader for Cooperation appearing for respondent No.5 and perused the record.

2. The appellant, who claims to be a member of respondent No.9-Toddy Tappers Co-operative Society Limited, Chintal Basthi, Hyderabad (hereinafter referred to as “the Society”) and was appointed as the Chairman of the Three Member Person-in-Charge (PIC) Committee thereof by proceedings dated 13.10.2025 has preferred the present appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent , assailing the common order dated 25.02.2026 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.Nos.5234 and 12402 of 2025. By the said common order, the learned Single Judge has dismissed W.P.No.5234 of 2025 and allowed W.P.No.12402 of 2025 by directing the respondents to appoint a Person-in-Charge to conduct elections to the respondent No.9-Society.

Factual matrix (in brief)

3. The respondent No.9-Society is registered under the provisions of the Telangana Co-operative Societies Act, 1964 (for short, “1964 Act”). The last elections to the Managing Committee of the said Society were conducted on 13.12.2014, and the tenure of the elected body came to an end in December, 2019. Thereafter, the affairs of the respondent No.9-Society were managed by a Person-in-Charge (PIC) Committee appointed by the competent authority.

4. In order to conduct fresh elections, steps were initiated for preparation of the list of eligible members/voters. Disputes arose with regard to the inclusion and exclusion of certain members, leading to multiple representations. The respondent No.4 (Functional Registrar), issued proceedings dated 05.10.2021, directing restoration of certain members. Pursuant thereto, a final voters list was prepared, and elections were conducted on 06.06.2022, resulting in the constitution of a newly elected Managing Committee.

5. Aggrieved thereby, the respondents herein (who were the writ petitioners in W.P.No.12402 of 2025) instituted O.P.No.14 of 2022 before the Co-operative Tribunal under Section 61(3) of the 1964 Act, calling in question the validity of the said elections. By order dated 23.01.2025, the Tribunal allowed the election petition, set aside the elections held on 06.06.2022, and directed the official respondents to take necessary steps for conducting fresh elections to the Society.

6. Challenging the aforesaid order of the Tribunal, the respondent No.9 society along with elected members of the Managing Committee preferred W.P.No.5234 of 2025 before this Court. By order dated 19.03.2025, the learned Single Judge granted an interim suspension of the Tribunal’s order and permitted the elected committee to continue in office pending further adjudication.

7. During the pendency of the said writ petition, the President and Vice-President of the respondent No.9-Society tendered their resignations on 07.10.2025. Consequent thereto, respondent No.4 issued proceedings dated 13.10.2025, appointing a three-member PIC Committee, with the appellant herein as its Chairman, to manage the affairs of the Society.

8. Meanwhile the respondents herein (petitioners in the election petition) filed W.P.No.12402 of 2025, seeking a direction to the official respondents to appoint a Person-in-Charge Committee and to conduct fresh elections in terms of the Tribunal’s order date

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top