IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN,THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY
SMT. P. KALAVATHI – Appellant
Versus
SMT. P. LAKSHMI AND ANR – Respondent
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY C.M.P. No. 11472 of 2003 IN/AND APPEAL SUIT No. 999 of 2003 Date: 16.04.2026 Between:
P. Kalavathi and two others ….. Appellants and Smt. P. Lakshmi and another ….. Respondents COMMON JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Vakiti Ramakrishna Reddy This Appeal Suit is filed by the Appellants/Defendants against the Judgment and Decree dated 04.06.2002 in O.S. No. 39 of 2000 on the file of the Family Court at Secunderabad, whereby the suit filed by the plaintiffs against the defendants for declaration and for recovery of possession of the Plaint Schedule Property, came to be decreed in favour of the plaintiffs.
2. It is pertinent to note that along with the present Appeal, the Appellants/Defendants have also filed a Civil Miscellaneous Petition vide C.M.P. No. 11472 of 2003 in A.S. No. 999 of 2003, invoking Order XLI Rule 27 of the Code of Civil Procedure, seeking permission to adduce additional evidence namely, the Will Deed dated
29.03.1998 and the other connected documents.
3. For the sake of convenience and clarity, the parties shall hereinafter be r
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.