IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
Aparesh Kumar Singh, CJ, G.M.Mohiuddin, J
Shaik Madar Saheb – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
ORDER
Heard Sri S.Krishna Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner;
Sri Mohammed Imran Khan, learned Additional Advocate General for the State of Telangana appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 3 and Sri Aruva Raghuram Mahadev, learned Assistant Government Pleader for the State of Andhra Pradesh appearing for respondent Nos.4 and 5 and perused the record.
2. The present writ petition is filed with the following prayer:
“…….to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the Charge Memo and Article of Charges issued by the Respondent No.1 vide G.O.Rt.No.40, dated 17.02.2010 and the action of the Respondent No.2 & 3 in withholding the retiral benefits including the final pension, gratuity and other benefits on the pretext of issuance of charge memo as arbitrary, illegal, unjust and for being violative of Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and A.P. Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1991, and quash/set-aside the same and consequently direct the Respondents to finalise and release the full pension and all retrial benefits as due and admissible to the Petitioner from the date of his re
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.