Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
N.V.Shravan Kumar, J
Mir Ahmed Khan – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner requests action against unauthorized building construction. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. municipal authorities' statutory powers to handle unauthorized construction. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. judicial precedent strictly enforces compliance with town planning laws. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. court directs authorities to consider representation and act lawfully. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for MA&UD appearing for respondent No.1 and Sri.Raparthi Venkatesh, learned standing counsel for GHMC appearing for respondent Nos.2 to 5. With their consent, the writ petition is being taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself.
2. This writ petition has being filed seeking the following prayer:-
“to declare the inaction on the part of the respondents Nos.2 to 5 against the illegal and unauthorised construction of two additional floors i.e., 5th and 6th floor (pent house) against the sanction plan of only stilt + 4 upper floors on property bearing Municipal No.16-11-15/10, Known as Tayyab Residency, Saleem Nagar, Malakpet, Hyderabad, is highly illegal, arbitrary and amounts to dereliction of duties and unconstit
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
