SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 12776

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA
TUPAKULA BALRAJ – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF A.P. – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.367 OF 2013 DATE: 31.03.2026 Between:

Tupakula Balraj … Appellant and The State of A.P., by the Public Prosecutor … Respondent : JUDGMENT :

This criminal appeal is filed by the appellant–Accused No.1 against the judgment dated 25.03.2013 passed in Sessions Case No.528 of 2011 by the learned Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad (for short ‘the trial Court’), whereby the appellant was found guilty of the offences under Sections 498-A and 304-B of the Indian Penal Code (for short ‘IPC’), convicted, and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/-, in default to undergo simple imprisonment for one month for the offence under Section 498-A IPC, and further sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/-, in default to undergo simple imprisonment for one month for the offence under Section 304-B IPC.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the accused 1 to 3 have harassed the deceased for want of dowry causing the death of the deceased within seven years of marriage. Hence,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top