SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 12854

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO
CAPTAIN IKRAM A.KALEEM HYDERABAD – Appellant
Versus
SECY MUN ADMN AND URBAN DEVT DEPT HYDERABAD AND 5 OTHERS – Respondent
WP 18128/2014



IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO WRIT PETITION No.18128 of 2014

16th FEBRUARY, 2026 Between:

Captain Ikram A.Kaleem S/o. late Mohd. Ali, aged 55 years, Occ: Retired Airline Executive, R/o. 10-5-15, Elagance Apartments, Opp: Police Officers Mess, Masab Tank, Hyderabad.

...Petitioner and State of Telangana rep. through its Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department, Secretariat Buildings, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad and 5 others.

...Respondents

ORDER

The present Writ Petition is filed seeking the following relief:

to issue a Writ, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other

appropriate Writ, Direction or Order directing the respondents to

remove all the encroachments on the road margins, foot-paths on the main road including the illegal constructions of pan shops, etc., on the road leading from Balaji Grand Bazar to Ahmed Nagar forthwith by removing the encroachments from foot-path ear-marked for the pedestrians use as per representations dated

14-06-2013 and 04-12-2013...”

2. Heard Mr.E.Madan Mohan Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Midde Arun Kumar, learned Standing Counsel for Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation representing respondent Nos.2 to 6. Perused the record.

3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Standing Counsel for respondent Nos.2 to 6 submits that the representations stated to have been made by the petitioner are from the year 2013, and that appropriate action would be initiated if a fresh application is submitted.

4. In view of the above, the petitioner is granted liberty to file a fresh application setting out all relevant facts regarding the encroachments on footpaths and road margins. Upon receipt of such application, respondent Nos.2 to 6 are directed to take appropriate action in accordance with law within a period of eight (8) weeks thereof.

5. With the above observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.

_______________________________ SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO, J Date:16.02.2026.

KRL

4872 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO WRIT PETITION No.18128 of 2014

16th FEBRUARY, 2026 KRL

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top