SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 12931

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO
Musham Chander – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana Rep. by its Principal Secretary – Respondent
WP 3308/2015



IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO WRIT PETITION No.3308 of 2015 DATE: 13.03.2026 Between:

Musham Chander.

…Petitioner AND The State of Telangana and another.

…Respondents

ORDER:

This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking the following relief/s:-

“…to issue an appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.2 is not granting construction of Building permission since from 25.02.2014 after receipt of the entire fees and interfering in construction of the building premises in Sy.No.2367/B, at Southern part for admeasuring 143.30 Sq.Yards or 119.79 Sq.Mtrs., situated at Road leads to Karimnagar to Warangal, adjacent to Bajaj Show Room, house bearing No.12- 229, Huzurabad village, Karimnagar District, pending application for permission File No.G1/104/2014, dated 25.02.2014, before the 2nd respondent which is violation of Section 214 of Municipalities Act, illegal, arbitrary, against the principles of natural justice and pass…”

2. When the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner’s application dated 25.02.2014, seeking permission upon payment of the requisite fees under the relevant provisions of the Municipalities Act, has been pending for a considerable period and that as the said application has not been rejected, it has attained the status of deemed approval, and without taking the same into consideration, the respondents are interfering with the constructions of the building. Accordingly, a direction is sought to consider the petitioner’s application in accordance with law.

3. In view of the above, the respondents are directed to consider the petitioner’s application, dated 25.02.2014, for grant of permission, as well as the petitioner’s entitlement to deemed approval. In the event of the respondent not considering the case of the petitioner for deemed approval, shall follow due process of law by issuing notice to the petitioner, calling for an explanation, and affording an opportunity of hearing, and thereafter, pass appropriate orders on the said application within a period of eight (08) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

4. With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of.

There shall be no orders as to costs.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any are pending, shall stand closed.

_________________________________ SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO, J

13.03.2026 FM

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top