SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 13155

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA
Arvind Kumar Raghuvanshi – Appellant
Versus
M/s Hitha Design Science Private Limited – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO.93 OF 2025 DATE OF ORDER: 10.04.2026 Between:

Arvind Kumar Raghuvanshi ...Applicant AND M/s.Hitha Design Science Private Limited, Rep. by Mr.Srinivas Valluri and Two Others ...Respondents Mr. Prem Kumar Pothina, learned counsel appearing for the applicant.

Mr. L. Venkateshwar Rao, learned counsel appearing for the respondents.

ORDER:

1. This Arbitration Application is filed under section 11(6) of The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (‘1996 Act’) seeking appointment of an Arbitrator. The applicant relies on Clause No.23 of the Memorandum of Association dated 19.01.1998 of Hitha Design Science Private Limited (respondent No.1).

2. I have heard the respective submissions of learned counsel appearing for the applicant and the respondents.

3. Counsel appearing for the respondents raises an objection to the maintainability of the Arbitration Application.

4. Clause 23 of the Memorandum of Association dated 19.01.1998 contains arbitration clause and the same is set out below:

‘23. To agree, or refer, or arbitration all disputes present or future between the compa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top