##PAGE1##

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA

C.R.P. NO.1112 OF 2026 DATE: 17.04.2026

Between:

Sake Nagarajugari Rekha Nandhaki and Another.

...Petitioners AND

Gunupudi Ramu.

...Respondent

Mr. Karri Murali Krishna, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners.

ORDER:

1. The present Civil Revision Petition arises out of an order dated 06.01.2026 passed by the learned VI Additional District and Sessions Judge-cum-Family Court, Ranga Reddy District at Kukatpally (‘Trial Court’) in I.A.No.1104 of 2025 in F.C.O.P.No.399 of 2023 partly allowing an application for Visitation Rights filed by the

respondent/petitioner.

2. The petitioner herein is the mother of the minor child aged 8 years. The petitioner filed a petition for dissolution of marriage on the grounds of cruelty and desertion under section 13(1)(ia) & (ib) of

2

The Hindu Marriage Act before the Trial Court (F.C.O.P.No.399 of

2023) against the respondent-Husband.

3. The sole contention of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner is that the respondent-Husband filed the I.A. after two years from the filing of the Divorce Petition seeking such Visitation

Rights.

4. This Court has perused the impugned order passed by the Trial Court. The impugned order specifically records that the fact of the respondent being the father of the minor child is not disputed. It is also recorded that the minor child is presently residing with the

maternal grandparents.

5. The Court found that the presence of both parents is necessary for the overall development of the child and accordingly

proceeded to grant Visitation Rights.

6. The Visitation Rights are granted only for two days on every

second Saturday of the month between 10:00 A.M. and 12:00 P.M.

7. This Court does not find any infirmity or unreasonableness in the impugned order since there is no dispute that the respondent is the natural biological father of the child. Even otherwise, the

3

duration of Visitation is extremely limited, extending to only two

hours on every second Saturday of each month.

8. Hence, there is no merit in the present Civil Revision Petition.

9. CRP No.1112 of 2026, along with all connected applications,

is accordingly dismissed.

__________________________________ MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA, J

DATE: 17.04.2026 NDS

4

THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA

C.R.P. NO.1112 OF 2026 DATE: 17.04.2026

NDS