IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE RENUKA YARA
Bhumika Gajre – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 37925/2025
##PAGE1##
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT
HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE RENUKA YARA
WRIT PETITION NO.37925 of 2025
THE 21ST DAY OF APRIL, 2026
Between:
Bhumika Gajre
…Petitioner
AND
The State of Telangana and 4 others
…Respondents
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed seeking the following relief:
“ … to issue an appropriate Writ Order or direction
more particularly in nature ofWrit of Mandamus declaring
action of the Respondents in rejecting the caste certificate
application applied for the Education purpose of the
Petitioner with a single line order without mentioning
proper details and not allowing Petitioner to get benefits of
their caste for education purpose is illegal, arbitrary,
unconstitutional and violation of Article 14, 15 and 21A of
the Constitution of and consequently, direct the 3rd and 4th
Respondents to consider the Application of the Petitioner
dt.23.10.2025 and issue Caste Certificate to the Petitioner
for her Education purpose and …..”
2. Heard Mr. B. Kiran Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and
Mr. S. Yogesh, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Social Welfare
appearing for respondent Nos.1 and 2 and learned Assistant Government
##PAGE2##RY,J
W.P_37925_2025
Pleader for Revenue for respondent Nos.3 and 4. Perused the entire
record.
3. The minor petitioner is pursuing Intermediate in Sri Chaitanya
Junior College, Ameerpet. She submitted an application dated 23.10.2025
to respondent No.3 for issuance of Caste Certificate showing her under
SC category. Said application was rejected by respondent No.4 vide
impugned Endorsement dated 23.10.2025 on the ground that required
documents are not submitted. Aggrieved by the same, the present writ
petition is filed.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the impugned
endorsement does not contain any reasoning as to the nature of documents
that were not submitted and the reason for rejection of the application.
Further, reliance is placed upon proceedings No.12017/02/2017-SCD
(R.L.Cell), dated 03.10.2019 issued by the Director (Admn.), Government
of India, Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment, Department of
Social Justice and Empowerment, where a direction was issued to all the
Chief Secretaries of all the State Governments and Union Territory
Administrations to consider the caste status of offspring of
separated/divorced/single women on the basis of caste of their mother as
2
##PAGE3##RY,J
W.P_37925_2025
per legal ratio laid down in Rameshbhai Dabhai Naika v. State of
Gujarat and others, (2012) 3 SCC 400
5. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Social Welfare
appearing for respondent Nos.1 and 2 opposed the writ petition stating
that the petitioner has submitted a Memorandum of Understanding dated
04.12.2013 showing settlement between the parents of the petitioner
without any judicial order pursuant to Memorandum of Understanding.
The Memorandum of Understanding only indicates a settlement but not
formal grant of divorce or separation between the parents of the petitioner.
Until such a document is produced, the learned Assistant Government
Pleader states that the case of the petitioner for grant of Caste Certificate
on the basis of mother’s Caste Certificate cannot be considered. To
consider the caste of the petitioner for grant of Caste Certificate under SC
category based on her mother’s certificate, the legal status of mother
being divorced or separated or single has to be demonstrated. In the
instant case, no such documents were produced. Further, the learned
Assistant Government Pleader relied upon the Presidential Order in
Proceeding No.35/1/72-R.U. (SCT-V), where the case of persons who
have migrated from one State to other seeking issuance of Caste
3
##PAGE4##RY,J
W.P_37925_2025
Certificate was considered. In the instant case, the petitioner’s father is a
resident of State of Karnataka, therefore, the VRO who conducted enquiry
has reported that the petitioner has migrated from the State of Karnataka
to State of Telangana and therefore, she is not entitled to issuance of C
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.