SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 14023

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY
B.Venkateshwara Rao – Appellant
Versus
B.Ramchander – Respondent


HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.141 of 2023 Date: 21.04.2026 Between :

B. Venkateshwara Rao …. Petitioner AND B. Ramchander ….Respondent

ORDER:

The present Civil Revision Petition is preferred by the petitioner aggrieved by the order dated 07.11.2022 (hereinafter referred to as the “impugned order”) passed by the learned XXVI Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, at Hyderabad, in I.A. No.1176 of 2019 in O.S. No.751 of 2011. By the Impugned Order, the Trial Court allowed the application filed by the respondent under Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act, directing that the Agreement of Sale (Ex.A1) bet sent to a handwriting expert for verification and submissions of a report regarding the disputed signature of the defendant.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties herein are referred to as per their status before the Trial Court.

I. BRIEF FACTS

3. The factual backdrop to the present revision is as follows:

a) The respondent/plaintiff filed O.S. No.751 of 2011 against the petitioner/defendant, seeking recovery of money and relied upon receipt marked as Ex. A2. During the proceedings, the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top