SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 14948

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K. Lakshman, B.R. Madhusudhan Rao, JJ
Smt. Meghana Pushpa – Appellant
Versus
Shri Suresh – Respondent
FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.221 OF 2017



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Vijay Ashrith, Verose Sanjana
For the Respondents:

A decree of divorce on the ground of cruelty cannot be granted based on mere allegations and the petitioner's own testimony; it requires cogent evidence proving conduct that adversely affects the spouse, as cruelty is subjective and case-specific.

Headnote:(A) Matrimonial Law - Cruelty - Burden of Proof - The party seeking dissolution of marriage on the ground of cruelty must plead and prove the same with cogent evidence; mere self-testimony of the petitioner without supporting witnesses or documentary evidence is insufficient to grant a decree of divorce. (Para 12, 19, 21)

(B) Matrimonial Law - Cruelty - Legal Proceedings - The mere act of lodging a criminal complaint under Section 498-A of the IPC or filing an application under Section 12 of the Domestic Violence Act does not per se constitute cruelty. (Para 12)

(C) Matrimonial Law - Concept of Cruelty - Subjectivity - Cruelty is not statutorily defined and its determination depends on the individual's upbringing, sensitivity, educational, family, and cultural background. (Para 14, 16, 18)

Issues: Whether the respondent husband proved the ground of cruelty with sufficient cogent evidence to justify the decree of divorce granted by the Family Court.

Table of Content
1. summary of matrimonial dispute, allegations of cruelty, and the lower court's initial decree. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
2. requirement of cogent evidence and the burden of proof on the party alleging cruelty. (Para 12 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)
3. the subjective and complex nature of cruelty in matrimonial relationships. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
4. setting aside the divorce decree due to failure to prove allegations with evidence. (Para 22 , 23)

JUDGMENT

(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice K.Lakshman)

Heard Sri Vijay Ashrith, learned counsel representing Mr.Verose Sanjana, learned counsel for the appellant. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the respondent.

2. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the order dated 18.04.2017, in FCOP.NO.564 of 2012, passed by the learned Family Court, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar, Hyderabad, appellant – wife preferred the present appeal.

3. Appellant is the wife and respondent is the husband.

4. Respondent – husband filed the aforesaid O.P contending that their marriage was performed on 20.03.2011 as per Hindu Rites and Customs. It is an arranged marriage. The said marriage was consummated. However, they were not blessed with any children out of their lawful wedlock. After the marriage, appellant joined the respondent at his house. The peculiar behavior of the appellant has exposed on the first day of marriage itself by stepping into the house with her left leg. The appellant used to insult him stating that he could have married another woman as she was not looking beautiful.

5. On one day, she started speaking to the Lord Shiva, as there was no response, she broken up the photo. When the respondent questioned her, she stated that God directed her to marry respondent only. She started insisting not to sleep when she was awake. 28th August is his birthday, his sister called him at midnight, appellant picked up the phone and abused her in filthy language. She started blaming him that he is maintaining illegal intimacy with his own mother. She was suffering with Schizophrenia. Respondent tried to take her to specialist doctor, but appellant threatened him that she will commit suicide and implicate the respondent and his mother in criminal cases.

6. On 21.11.2011, the respondent returned home from his office, appellant without any warning started abusing and threatening him, locked herself into a room, wrapped a saree around her neck and attempted to commit suicide. She called her father stating that respondent was trying to kill her. Within 20 minutes, 30 to 40 members gathered and beat the respondent mercilessly and also beat his mother. Therefore, they escaped from there and went to police station. But the police did not receive any complaint.

7. It is further alleged that on 22.11.2011, the Police Ibrahimpatnam called the appellant and respondent for reconciliation. Appellant demanded that she will live with the respondent separately from his mother. If the respondent failed to accept the said demand, she will implicate the respondent in a criminal case for the offence under Section 498-A of IPC. The respondent maintained maximum composure to maintain peace. There was no change in the attitude of the appellant. She used to threaten him saying that she will pour acid on his face so that he become ugly and that kill him by pouring petrol.

8. Appellant filed counter denying the said allegations. However, she admitted that at the time of marriage, they have arranged an amount of Rs.12,00,000/- towards dowry and also other requirements. She never behaved in a rude manner as alleged by the respondent. He has made such allegation only to get rid of her and to get second marriage.

9. To prove the said allegations of cruelty, respondent examined himself as PW1 and filed Exs.P1 to P6. To disprove the same, appellant examined herself as RW1.

10. On consideration of the entire evidence both oral and documentary, learned Family Court allowed the said O.P

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top