SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 14979

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
Konda Ravindrachandra Reddy – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 19283/2023



I N THE HI GH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTI CE SUREPALLI NANDA WRI T PETI TI ON No.19283 OF 2023 DATED: 12.03.2026 Between:

Konda Ravindrachandra Reddy … Petitioner AND The State of Telangana and 5 others.

…Respondents

ORDER:

Heard Sri D. Sudarshan Reddy, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Endowments, appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3 and Sri J. R. Manohar Rao, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.4. 2. The petitioner approached the Court seeking prayer as under:

“…to issue appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly, a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the Impugned Proceedings in Memo No.G3/9035/2023, dt.15.07.2023, of the 2nd Respondent Commissioner, Endowments, Hyderabad, in constitution of Non-Hereditary Trust Board, appointing the respondents No.5-10 herein as Members of the Trust board, to the 4th respondent subject Sri Lakshmi Venkateswara Swamy Temple, Road No.1 and 12, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, and the consequential Orders of the 3rd respondent herein in Rc.No.B3/2967/2022,dt.15.07.2023, for administration of Oath of Office and Secrecy, are as illegal, arbitrary, unjust without following and in violating the provisions of the Endowments Act, and the Rules, by exercising the colourful Jurisdiction, consequently to set-aside as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the law, in violation of the provisions of the Endowments Act,1987 and pass such other order and further orders in the interest of Justice and in the circumstances of the case.”

3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Endowments, appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos.1 to 3 submit that the cause of action in the present writ petition does not survive for adjudication, anymore and the writ petition has become infructuous.

4. Bringing the said submission made by both the learned counsel on record, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

However, there shall be no order as to costs.

5. The interim order granted by this Court on 21.07.2023 stands vacated.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed.

__________________________

MRS. JUSTI CE SUREPALLI NANDA Date: 12.03.2026 Dsu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top