IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No.5836 of 2026 DATE OF ORDER: 15.04.2026 Between:

Kare Naresh and another ...Petitioners AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad, and others ...Respondents

ORDER:

This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed seeking the following relief:

“….to declare the action of the Respondents Nos.2 to 4 in opening rowdy sheet by virtue of Proceedings in C.No.127/SDPO-N/2024 dated 30/04/2024 against the petitionerss based on one crime alleged to have in C.No.121/SDPO-N/204 and 121/SDPO-N/204 Dated 19/09/2024 of 3^rd respondent even though the petitionerss were not the habitual offenders and not involved in any breach of peace and public tranquillity and the same is being continued by extending the rowdy sheet without specifying any reason as arbitrary illegal violation of Part III of the Constitution of India as against the Articles 14, 15, 21, 22 and paradox to Police Standing Orders No.601 of APPM and set aside the same and consequently direct the respondent Nos.2 to 4 to close the rowdy sheet against the petitioners in the 3^rd respondent police station in the interest of justice.…”

2. Heard Ms.Sravanthi Reddy, learned counsel representing Mr.Karunakar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. M.Srinivas, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for the respondent Nos.1 to 4 and perused the record.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in Crime No.168 of 2024 registered under Sections 354-D, 354, 356, 379, 504, 506 read with 34 IPC and Section 3(1)(r)(s) and 3(2)(v)(a) of SCs/STs (POA) Act, 2015 and a rowdy sheet has been opened against the petitioners though they were not habitual offenders. Under the guise of the rowdy sheet opened against the petitioners, the respondent-authorities are harassing the petitioners, causing repeated summons, nocturnal visits to their residence, and mental distress, thereby affecting their livelihood and disturbing their families.

4. It is submitted that under Standing Orders 601, 602, and 742 of the A.P. Police Manual, rowdy sheets can only be maintained against habitual offenders who repeatedly commit offences affecting public order, peace, or security. The petitioners, having not been involved in any criminal case for more than three years, does not qualify as a habitual offender, and therefore, the rowdy sheet maintained against them is unlawful.

5. Maintenance of rowdy sheets is governed by Standing Order No.601 of A.P. Police Manual, Part-I, Volume II, which reads as under:

“601. The following persons may be classified as rowdies and Rowdy Sheets (Form 80) may be opened for them under the orders of the SP/DCP and ACP/SDPO.

A. Persons who habitually commit, attempt to commit or abet the commission of offences involving a breach of the peace, disturbance to public order and security.

B. Persons bound over under Sections 106, 107, 108(1)

(i) and 110(e) and (g) of Cr.P.C.

C. Persons who have been convicted more than once in two consecutive years under sections 59 and 70 of the Hyderabad City Police Act or under section 3, clause 12, of the AP Towns Nuisances Act.

D. Persons who habitually tease women and girls and pass indecent remarks.

F. Persons who intimidate by threats or use of physical violence or other unlawful means to part with movable or immovable properties or in the habit of collecting money by extortion from shopkeepers, traders and other residents. G. Persons who incite and instigate communal/caste or political riots.

H. Persons detained under the “AP Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Dacoits, Drug Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders and Land-Grabbers Act, 1986” for a period of 6 months or more.

I. Persons who are convicted for offences under the Representative